Saturday, February 2, 2013
The Gist of Doomsday Preppers
Popular Show
Many people are aware that there is a growing movement here in the USA regarding "Prepping" or being prepared for emergencies. Estimates are that there are over 4-5 million people involved in this subliminal activity. National Geographic TV exploits this idea in a NEGATIVE context each week. It's called "Doomsday Preppers."
Watch What You Watch
Each show of Doomsday Preppers highlights a prepper person or family somewhere in the US. Each one is preparing for any number of different scenarios. They can be anything from an EMP pulse from the sun (or atomic bomb) to that of a polar shift resulting in severe climactic change throughout the entire planet. The more exaggerated, the better. This helps make these individuals look more foolish (or in some cases really wacko) to help promote National Geographic's agenda. They highlight people with some really far-out ideas about why they are preppers. That's the idea behind this show. The show producers want to project a NEGATIVE viewpoint against anyone who is considered a prepper. They don't come out and say it, but they believe that these people are just plain crazy! Preppers, after all, are living on the fringe and are not playing with a full deck of cards. They're like the nuts who want to own guns.
The New York Times reports on the "fringe prepper culture": "Even more seriously, what is the attraction of continuing to live in a world that will almost certainly not have television or the Internet, depriving doomsday types of the shows and Web sites that fuel their paranoia and sell products exploiting it?" (Incidentally, the NYTs doesn't think too much of Preppers either!)
What to Take Away
Let the others think what they want about being ready for emergencies. Learn whatever you can about how to survive a disaster. Remember the Katrina and Sandy victims. Learn from their plight. Smile if and when another disaster happens because you and your family will have the knowledge and foresight to know what to do and how to help others. Learn and believe also that you can't count on the government to help! Become self-sufficient.
Friday, February 1, 2013
Privacy is Dead
Cell Phones
With the advent of cellular communications came the proliferation of a camera in every bodies hands. Not just a still camera, but a video camera. Within moments of any activity, your image can be posted immediately on the Internet.
Internet
Speaking of which, before Al Gore invented the Internet you did have some degree of privacy. However, the Internet plus cell phones have destroyed what little privacy remained.
Drones
More and more police departments are applying to the FAA for using drones for "police work." They are used for surveillance of all types. Look up, you may see one in action.
Cameras
Look around yourself. There are cameras in banks, grocery stores, department stores, gas stations, courthouses, post offices, and on and on… Cameras are everywhere. You have no privacy because of cameras. Your image is being scanned at public events like football games. The government is looking for "terrorists."
Twitter/FaceBook/Google/YouTube
The government (Department of Homeland Security) is requiring all social media players and major ISPs (Internet Service Providers) to "participate" with government requests for their databases. Most do and your personal information is being shared with the federal government whether you know it or not. Your "posts" and searches are scanned for all the bad government "keywords."
Likewise email is also being watched and monitored by your government. They look for the names of government officials, government agencies, government acronyms and many many more words on the government watch list.
Amazon
Your purchases at Amazon and all other online stores are a matter of record. They can tell you what you bought, how many, and when. This information is also shared with other merchants as well as the government.
To Sum It Up
Unless you live in a cave somewhere, your privacy is DEAD! These are only a few ways in which you have been invaded!
Thursday, January 31, 2013
Guest Article: The Stuff of Third World Tyrants
By David Limbaugh
President Barack Obama is not just a radical leftist; he is obviously so ensconced in his ideology that he believes -- or wants you to believe -- that anyone who opposes him must have sinister motives.
One of his recurring themes is that some Republicans would work with him but can't do so for fear of reprisal from Grover Norquist on taxes, the National Rifle Association on guns, the conservative House caucus, radio talk show hosts and your garden-variety racists, who allegedly oppose Obama just for sport.
In mid-January, Obama accused the "gun lobby" of "ginning up" fears that the federal government would use the Newtown, Conn., shooting tragedy to seize America's guns, saying, "It's certainly good for business." Is that how presidents should talk?
Obama suggested that GOP congressional opposition was based not on principle but on the fear that unless it resisted Obama's gun-grabbing schemes, it would lose its precious NRA funding. As if the American public agrees with Obama on this issue any more than it did on Obamacare. As if Obama truly cares whether the American public agrees with him on this issue (other than as a means to an end) any more than he cared about the public's view on Obamacare.
Indeed, this is either record-breaking myopia or sophisticated Orwellian deception. Few things are more palpable on the political scene today than the groundswell of grass-roots support for the right to own firearms under the Second Amendment. It is intrinsic to the American character.
One of his recurring themes is that some Republicans would work with him but can't do so for fear of reprisal from Grover Norquist on taxes, the National Rifle Association on guns, the conservative House caucus, radio talk show hosts and your garden-variety racists, who allegedly oppose Obama just for sport.
In mid-January, Obama accused the "gun lobby" of "ginning up" fears that the federal government would use the Newtown, Conn., shooting tragedy to seize America's guns, saying, "It's certainly good for business." Is that how presidents should talk?
Obama suggested that GOP congressional opposition was based not on principle but on the fear that unless it resisted Obama's gun-grabbing schemes, it would lose its precious NRA funding. As if the American public agrees with Obama on this issue any more than it did on Obamacare. As if Obama truly cares whether the American public agrees with him on this issue (other than as a means to an end) any more than he cared about the public's view on Obamacare.
Indeed, this is either record-breaking myopia or sophisticated Orwellian deception. Few things are more palpable on the political scene today than the groundswell of grass-roots support for the right to own firearms under the Second Amendment. It is intrinsic to the American character.
Obama didn't just mischaracterize the public mood on the issue of gun control; he threw in an additional allegation of political corruption against Republicans, saying, "The House Republican majority is made up mostly of members who are in sharply gerrymandered districts that are very safely Republican and may not feel compelled to pay attention to broad-based public opinion, because what they're really concerned about is the opinions of their specific Republican constituencies."
Do you see the pattern here? As the leading disciple of radical community organizer Saul Alinsky, Obama must delegitimize his political opposition. He can't just debate issues on the merits. He must "pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it." We've seen Obama do it on virtually every policy he has promoted -- from demonizing health care professionals and insurance companies in pursuit of Obamacare to taunting "fat cat banks" in his quest for financial "reform" to his defamation of "big oil" to his personal attacks on the "rich" to his savaging of Rep. Paul Ryan and other House Republicans as callous toward seniors and the middle class for daring to reform entitlements.
Obama will not stand for House Republicans to be seen as good-faith opponents to his socialist agenda. He has to slander them with charges of nefarious motives. Republicans oppose his gun grab because they jealously guard their corruptly acquired congressional seats (through gerrymandering), which depend upon blood money from the NRA, which is motivated by its own lust for profits. There simply can't be any legitimate public opposition to his position, because, by gosh, he's the president and his views -- and mandate -- are superior.
Obama isn't content just to vilify his congressional opposition. With a newfound cockiness from his re-election that even exceeds his previous levels, he has now called out Fox News and private citizen Rush Limbaugh. Alinsky's cremated ashes must be glowing with delight.
Obama said, "If a Republican member of Congress is not punished on Fox News or by Rush Limbaugh for working with a Democrat on a bill of common interest, then you'll see more of them doing it." He added, "The more left-leaning media outlets recognize that compromise is not a dirty word" and that Democratic leaders are "willing to buck the more absolutist-wing elements in our party to try to get stuff done."
That statement alone should tell you how warped Obama's perspective is. The congressional Democratic leadership is already so leftist and uncompromising that it doesn't have to worry about pleasing more leftist elements. And the left-leaning media not only don't recognize what true compromise is but also don't hold Obama to account for his own habitual refusal to compromise.
That Obama is the most ideologically extreme president in history and routinely demonizes his political opponents is bad enough. But he has crossed the line in targeting the sole TV news outlet that refuses to allow his propaganda to go unchallenged and even more so in attacking commentator Rush Limbaugh for the sin of articulating the opinions of millions upon millions of American patriots who are horrified at Obama's statist agenda.
Do you see the pattern here? As the leading disciple of radical community organizer Saul Alinsky, Obama must delegitimize his political opposition. He can't just debate issues on the merits. He must "pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it." We've seen Obama do it on virtually every policy he has promoted -- from demonizing health care professionals and insurance companies in pursuit of Obamacare to taunting "fat cat banks" in his quest for financial "reform" to his defamation of "big oil" to his personal attacks on the "rich" to his savaging of Rep. Paul Ryan and other House Republicans as callous toward seniors and the middle class for daring to reform entitlements.
Obama will not stand for House Republicans to be seen as good-faith opponents to his socialist agenda. He has to slander them with charges of nefarious motives. Republicans oppose his gun grab because they jealously guard their corruptly acquired congressional seats (through gerrymandering), which depend upon blood money from the NRA, which is motivated by its own lust for profits. There simply can't be any legitimate public opposition to his position, because, by gosh, he's the president and his views -- and mandate -- are superior.
Obama isn't content just to vilify his congressional opposition. With a newfound cockiness from his re-election that even exceeds his previous levels, he has now called out Fox News and private citizen Rush Limbaugh. Alinsky's cremated ashes must be glowing with delight.
Obama said, "If a Republican member of Congress is not punished on Fox News or by Rush Limbaugh for working with a Democrat on a bill of common interest, then you'll see more of them doing it." He added, "The more left-leaning media outlets recognize that compromise is not a dirty word" and that Democratic leaders are "willing to buck the more absolutist-wing elements in our party to try to get stuff done."
That statement alone should tell you how warped Obama's perspective is. The congressional Democratic leadership is already so leftist and uncompromising that it doesn't have to worry about pleasing more leftist elements. And the left-leaning media not only don't recognize what true compromise is but also don't hold Obama to account for his own habitual refusal to compromise.
That Obama is the most ideologically extreme president in history and routinely demonizes his political opponents is bad enough. But he has crossed the line in targeting the sole TV news outlet that refuses to allow his propaganda to go unchallenged and even more so in attacking commentator Rush Limbaugh for the sin of articulating the opinions of millions upon millions of American patriots who are horrified at Obama's statist agenda.
This is the stuff of Third World tyrants, my friends. This is the MO of dictators, who want to control the media and silence any unfavorable coverage or commentary. Even liberals should be outraged at this abominable behavior. And they should have the integrity to say so."
Wednesday, January 30, 2013
Do NOT Use Violence
Government Preparations
If you have been paying attention to this administration, they have been very busy preparing for new government powers in the event of a national emergency. Obama has written several "Presidential Directives" that gives him dictatorial powers if/when marshall law is invoked. The National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) is a great example. It allows our military to arrest American citizens at home and abroad. That means that the military can arrest YOU in your home with nothing more than the suspicion that you are a "terrorist." This kind of police power is identical to those of the NAZIS used in the 1930's to silence opposition to the government.
The Department of Homeland Security has purchased literally MILLIONS of rounds of ammunition for handguns and rifles. They claim that the Department of Social Security needs the ammo for training purposes. Now the DHS is buying 7,000 fully automatic AR-15s with 30 round magazines. They claim these rifles are for "personal protection." Now if you believe this CRAP, ok, go drink some more KOOL AID. Protection? From who? Aren't the dreaded Assault rifles only meant to kill people?
They Want You To
With all this government activity in front of your very eyes, isn't it possible that you are watching the government building it's own new army? Why on earth does DHS need 7,000 fully automatic assault rifles? Doesn't anyone wonder why?
Cynical has it seems, but the government would like nothing more than to have society begin to break down. Then they could clamp-down on everyone using the military by declaring marshall law. Are you aware that Obama is changing the military chain of command? He's replacing military leaders who would refuse to fire upon American citizens with those who would. What's that message telling us? Why is he arming the Department of Homeland Security with military weapons? Who are they at war with? Who will these weapons be used against?
Do NOT Use Force
The gun debate is stirring up a lot of emotions. The last thing to do is to become violent. Until the government actually knocks at your door, avoid violence at all costs. Instead, find like-minded people and unite with them. The government will never come for the guns if it's citizens are well organized. Remember that and get organized.
Tuesday, January 29, 2013
A Picture Is Worth 1000 Words
They say that one picture is worth over one thousand words. Here is the perfect example that illustrates evil and a liar in one image:
One picture says it all in the wink of an eye.
Monday, January 28, 2013
The New Brown Shirts
Facts
The Department of Homeland (DHS) security is currently purchasing 7,000 fully automatic "Assault Rifles." This goes along with their recent purchases of literally MILLIONS of rounds of both handgun and rifle ammunition. That ammunition was purchased for agencies like the Department of Social Security (DSS). OH REALLY? Why would the DSS need millions of rounds of ammunition in the first place? What the HELL does Social Security need assault rifles for? Why didn't they buy the rifles and ammunition at the same time? What are they hiding?
The New Army
Just exactly what is going on in front of our very eyes? Is YOUR government creating a new militia of it's own? Recall that Obama wanted to do just that very thing when he was first elected. He wanted his own "POLICE FORCE." Why exactly does the DHS need ammunition in ridiculous numbers along with the dreaded "Assault Rifles" with high capacity magazines? Isn't this government currently BANNING ASSAULT WEAPONS? They claim that they are for "Personal Defense." For whom? Who in the government needs a light machine gun for "Personal Defense" - against what? Against who?
Why is Obama re-shuffling the military chain of command? He's only putting leaders who will commit to firing on US citizens - if necessary.
If you're buying that DHS needs these weapons, then you keep on ignoring the real world, drink your KOOL AID, and wait for this government to surprise you with a total takeover.
Time to Be Scared
When your government is actively trying to ban firearms from law-abiding citizens while stockpiling weapons and ammunition for its government departments for "Personal Defense" you have to smell a lie! Weren't "Assault Weapons" supposed to be bad and how come THEY can buy the full-auto versions with high capacity magazines? Oh, that's right, they have to be able to load those MILLIONS of rounds already purchased.
What are they doing here? Look at the BIG picture. Why does DHS need fully automatic weapons with high magazine capacities? What is this administration building here? Is this the new Gestapo for the 21st Century? We need answers not more BS coming from the White House.
Action To Take
Tell family and friends about these actions and get them to call the White House and demand some straight answers. They are suppose to be working for us, not imprisoning us instead.
Sunday, January 27, 2013
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)