Sunday, February 7, 2016

GOP Debate

Last night was important. John Kasich said earlier that he should run as a Democrat. He's right, because he sounds just like one! He supports Common Core, Planned Parenthood, and other popular Leftist positions. Thanks John for making that all clear last night. We now know that you're REALLY a Moderate Democrat in Republican clothes. Go join Hillary and Bernie where you belong.

The BIGGEST LOOSER was RINO Rubio. We don't feel too sad about that because he betrayed the Tea Party voters who elected him to the US Senate. Rubio worked with the Gang of Eight to pass legislation that gives AMNESTY to ILLEGALS. Rubio hasn't ANY good explanation for this support. When he realized that he lost Tea Party supporters, he dumped the idea. He has no scruples! Last night Rubio showed that he cannot think on his feet. He looked like a deer in the headlights and was dumbfounded. He couldn't carry on a conversation because he was programed to give specific talking points no matter what happened. It didn't work. When challenged with questions he couldn't answer, he kept repeating the same rehearsed non-answer. It was so obvious, that it was embarrassing. Oh well. That should help him get knocked-down a notch or two where he belongs. He's NOT qualified to become President.

This ties-in together with Rubio's recent political endorsements. For example, Rick Santorum on live TV, couldn't list ANY achievements by Rubio as Senator! That's some endorsement! Perhaps it's because he has NONE! That makes you wonder what favors Rubio is calling-in from the Establishment GOP to help give him a boost in a close contest. The Establishment sees that their number one (JEB BUSH) is doing poorly and so they are now helping their OTHER Establishment candidate (Rubio). If you don't like career politicians, then Rubio should be off your list.

Trump on the other hand, didn't damage himself even though he managed to insult the audience a couple of times. They answered Trump with boos, which he sloughed-off. In spite of an argument with Bush over eminent domain, Trump succeeded in doing a decent job debating.

Ted Cruz clearly explained what happened in Iowa dispelling the Media's misrepresentation of the facts. He publicly and sincerely apologized to Ben Carson for the improprieties directed towards Carson in the Iowa Caucuses, showing Cruz has some class. Cruz did well and should be happy with his performance.

Other than one challenge against Trump, Jeb Bush did OK, but seriously, he doesn't have a chance at the nomination. He has oodles of money because he is the Establishment's first choice and that's the main reason why people don't like him! He's already bough and paid for and is part of the problem. He's a career politician and people don't want that this time around.

Chris Christie totally surprised Rubio and showed how he has way more energy than most other candidates - except Trump. However, Christie won't make the final cut either. Too little - too late. He was great in showing Rubio's weaknesses, but that won't be enough for him to win the nomination.

Ben Carson complained about the improprieties in Iowa (directed at Cruz). Other than that,  he made no significant remarks that would give him the help he desperately needs to move up. Sorry Ben, you're a man of integrity, but that's not enough to get to the White House this time around.

So it still looks like Trump is on top. Time will tell.



Wednesday, January 27, 2016

Master Manipulator

Don't look now, but you're being hoodwinked once again. The Trump campaign announced that he would NOT attend the Thursday evening debate because he doesn't want Megyn Kelly to moderate because she's unfair to him. REALLY? What's he REALLY afraid of?

Fox News refused to replace Kelly. (Good for them!)

Today we see Donald Trump polling on the Internet asking his followers if he should attend the debate. He's jerking us all around while getting free airtime and free publicity.

Let's face it, he is MANIPULATING the media and YOU once again. Is this the type of temperament we want to see displayed from the White House? Trump may be masterful in getting his own way, but what happens when he doesn't? Looks like he throws a HISSY FIT.

Can we trust Trump after this unscrupulous behavior?? Does he belong in charge of the nuclear codes?

When he shows up tomorrow, we will have proof that it was all a SHAM.


Sunday, January 24, 2016

Trump's Definition of "Conservative"

When asked what is a Conservative on CBS’s Face the Nation, Donald Trump responded as follows:

Question: “What is your definition of conservative?”

TRUMP: “Well, I think it’s a person that doesn’t want to take risks. I think that’s a good thing. A person that wants to in terms of government I’m talking about. Person that wants to conserve, a person that wants to in financial sense balance budgets. A person that feels strongly about the military and I feel very strong low about the military. And you have some of these Amy they don’t even want to focus on the military. Our military is falling apart I feel very — I have always felt very strongly about the military. By the way, if you look at vision, the word vision, I was the one that said, take the oil, I’ve been saying that for years, take the oil, let’s take the oil. Nobody would listen then all of a sudden after Paris they started saying maybe that’s right we’ll take the oil. They still don’t take the proper way. I was — which is a little bit different than Normal conservative. But I was very much opposed to the war in Iraq. Lot of these guys were all for the war in Iraq look what’s that has got it. Spent $2 trillion, now handing Iraq over, just handing over to Iran. Iran is going to take over Iraq I said that was going to happen. I said that years ago. In 2003 that Iran will take over Iraq was largest oil reserves in the world that’s not a conservative position. When I was saying, don’t go into Iraq I’m a very militaristic person, I’m very much into the military, will build our military better and stronger, that’s the — opposed to what we have now. I was opposed to the war in Iraq. Most conservatives, let’s go gung-ho. Everyone of them wanted the war in Iraq. Look where it got us.

Merriam-Webster brief definition of Conservative: 
a :  of or relating to a philosophy of conservatism
b capitalized :  of or constituting a political party professing the principles of conservatism: as

  • (1) :  of or constituting a party of the United Kingdom advocating support of established institutions 
  • (2) :  progressive conservative
  • 3a :  tending or disposed to maintain existing views, conditions, or institutions :  traditional
  • 3b :  marked by moderation or caution
  • 3c :  marked by or relating to traditional norms of taste, elegance, style, or manners
  • 4 :  of, relating to, or practicing Conservative Judaism

Merriam-Webster full definition of Conservative

  • 1a :  an adherent or advocate of political conservatism
  • 1b    capitalized :  a member or supporter of a conservative political party
  • 2a :  one who adheres to traditional methods or views
  • 2b :  a cautious or discreet person

Does his definition even come close? Any Questions?

Beware!

Sunday, January 17, 2016

VETTING TRUMP

Enthusiasm is a wonderful thing. It elected Barack Hussein Obama as our president. Look where we are today. America is heading on the WRONG DIRECTION!

Do you want to make the SAME MISTAKE AGAIN? Isn't it time to vet Trump? Although Trump is and has been the leader in the polls, we haven't taken the time to check-out the REAL Donald Trump and where he stands on the issues.

Here is a brief summary of some of his positions:

ABORTION: In the past he was "Very Pro-choice," not so much any more.

PLANNED PARENTHOOD: Trump feels that abortions shouldn't receive any taxpayer dollars, BUT “I would look at the good aspects of [Planned Parenthood], and I would also look because I’m sure they do some things properly and good for women. I would look at that, and I would look at other aspects also, but we have to take care of women.” That's having it BOTH WAYS!

RELIGIOUS CONTROLS IMPOSED BY GOVERNMENT: Trump supports the Supreme Court decision to legitimize religious discrimination against people who practice their faith. He says "You have to go with it. The decision’s been made, and that is the law of the land."

COLLEGE LOANS: He says "The federal government should not make money on student loans because so many students face crushing debt." This is the PROGRESSIVE POSITION!

UNIONS: Trump indicates that he is NOT a strong supporter of workers rights in states without right-to-work laws, when he says "Collective bargaining doesn’t bother me so much." So he's Pro-Union (Private and Public).

WELFARE REFORM: Trump has downplayed that reform would be necessary. This means that things would remain the same as they are now.

SOCIAL SECURITY: He wants to raise the retirement age to 70.

HEALTHCARE: He supports universal health care funded by HIGHER corporate taxes. He like the Single Payer system found in Canada. He wants a government subsidized system.

GOVERNMENT OVERREACH: Trump supported "some elements of the Obama Administration’s agenda of government overreach" and praised the Obama appointment of the activist former Obama EPA Administrator, Lisa Jackson.

WASHINGTON CRONYISM: He understands how to take advantage of government policy to benefit HIS bottom line. He offers little reason that he would do much to rein in government favoritism. He got rich using this system.

GOVERNMENT INTERVENTION: Trump supports empowering cronyists in the federal government to provide funds to the favored projects of well-connected special interests - just like Obama did with the failed Solyndra. This is personal gain at taxpayer's expense.

IMMIGRATION: He agrees that ILLEGALS should have a "Path" to legalization (CITIZENSHIP or AMNESTY) based on his unexplained "merit system."

These are a few examples on where Trump stands. These are NOT Conservative positions. They are PROGRESSIVE positions! He rarely - if ever - cites protecting the Constitution. That should bother you if you are a Conservative.



Sunday, January 3, 2016

Time Is Running Out

We now have anarchy in Oregon. Armed citizens have taken over government buildings and vow to remain for "as long as it takes" to protect ranchers. We have a Black Mississippi city councilman inciting black residents to throw rocks and antagonize police. We have Black Lives Matter groups challenging police departments all over trying to incite violence. There are mass shootings in Chicago on a daily basis.

What's next?

This plays right into Obama's script. He's going to challenge the 2nd Amendment by re-writing gun laws. He has no REAL powers to do so. He will STEAL THEM like he has before. He wants citizens to be unarmed because that makes it easier for the government to control masses of Americans.

Martial Law can become a reality if this continues. Martial Law eliminates ALL freedoms! Obama would remain in office past his term if this happens. There wouldn't be any presidential elections. This would be the end of America as we know it.

This is becoming close to reality. In seven years, Obama has eliminated military leaders who would NOT shoot Americans. The military has been training to go door-to-door in "exercises." Why? To control anarchy.

It's not too late. It's time to push-back. Don't allow the President pursue dashing our freedoms. Voice your opinions or loose your freedoms.



Sunday, December 27, 2015

Let's Get Real

It's time for Republicans to get their act together. Seriously! The next debate should ONLY have a few candidates and not the entire Clown Circus they have been giving the American Public.

Only candidate who polls less than 5% should be omitted from the televised debates. This would allow voters the opportunity to focus on just one or two candidates to see how they behave.

The way things stand now, you're lucky to see any candidate have the opportunity on the microphone for no more than 2-4 times during the 2 hour debate.

Stop wasting OUR time and whittle-down the field by eliminating those who don't make the cut in the national polls.

What do you think?




Sunday, December 20, 2015

Global Warming or Government Hacking?

This year the east coast won't see a white Christmas because meteorologists predict unseasonably warm weather. The key word there is "unseasonable."

Introduce - HAARP (High Frequency Auroral Research Program). This was a "research" project funded by the Air Force, Navy, University of Alaska, and the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA). It started in 1990 and is STILL in operation.

HAARP System in Alaska

 Some say HAARP can be used to deliberately generate weather modification, cause earthquakes, disrupt global radio communication systems, and to cause tsunamis. Perhaps this goes along with the Military's idea of "Full Spectrum Dominance" alias "Full Spectrum Superiority." Some believe that this is the goal of today's military to control all dimensions of warfare including:

  • Areal
  • Terrestrial
  • Maritime
  • Subterranean
  • Psychological
  • Bio & cyber warfare
  • Electromagnetic warfare

HAARP "research" is kept totally secret from taxpayers ("for national security") because if people REALLY knew about what it does and what it's doing they would be outraged. The government told Americans that the HAARP program was closed down. That's was true, however, what they forgot to mention is that that was for re-tooling. It didn't go away. It got more powerful. HAARP literally fries the Ionosphere with 3.6 MEGAWATTS of high energy electromagnetic particles. The ionosphere is the delicate upper layer of the atmosphere where radio waves bounce back to earth. HAARP can potentially disrupt all VHF, UHF, and HF radio communications more than the sun does. However HAARP is worse than that.

The Canadians are well aware of our military's "experiments" because they realize the consequences of these "experiments." Here is a quote from the Canadian Public Broadcasting:

"It isn’t just conspiracy theorists who are concerned about HAARP. In January of 1999, the European Union called the project a global concern and passed a resolution calling for more information on its health and environmental risks. Despite those concerns, officials at HAARP insist the project is nothing more sinister than a radio science research facility."

Our own History Channel has aired concerns, as follows:

"Electromagnetic weapons … pack an invisible wallop hundreds of times more powerful than the electrical current in a lightning bolt. One can blast enemy missiles out of the sky, another could be used to blind soldiers on the battlefield, still another to control an unruly crowd by burning the surface of their skin. If detonated over a large city, an electromagnetic weapon could destroy all electronics in seconds. They all use directed energy to create a powerful electromagnetic pulse.

Directed energy is such a powerful technology it could be used to heat the ionosphere to turn weather into a weapon of war. Imagine using a flood to destroy a city or tornadoes to decimate an approaching army in the desert. The military has spent a huge amount of time on weather modification as a concept for battle environments. If an electromagnetic pulse went off over a city, basically all the electronic things in your home would wink and go out, and they would be permanently destroyed."

Haven't you wondered about the unusual "natural" disasters in the news? Isn't it time you did? What is the government REALLY doing? Is HAARP a weapon? Is this THE reason for Global Warming?