Monday, November 21, 2016

PROPRAGANDISTS REVEALED

Thanks to Wikileaks we now have a list of the so-called "journalists" who collaborated with the Hillary campaign to support her efforts.  This list is copied from infowars.com:

Here are the conspirators:


These people CANNOT be believed OR trusted.


Wednesday, October 12, 2016

Supporters of Planned Parenthood

Before you shop, bank, or buy stocks, you'd better know this fact. There are at least 37 different entities who all support Planned Parenthood.The following companies directly fund the abortion business at Planned Parenthood:

Adobe, American Express, Avon, Bank of America, Bath & Body Works, Ben & Jerry’s, Boeing, Clorox, Converse, Deutsche Bank, Dockers, Energizer, Expedia, ExxonMobil, Fannie Mae, Groupon, Intuit, Johnson & Johnson, La Senza, Levi Strauss, Liberty Mutual, Macy’s, March of Dimes, Microsoft, Morgan Stanley, Nike, Oracle, PepsiCo, Pfizer, Progressive Insurance, Starbucks, Tostitos, Unilever, United Way, Verizon, Wells Fargo

This should give you pause...


Wednesday, July 6, 2016

Who Supported "Kate's Law" Today?

The US Senate voted on Kate's Law today. It FAILED. It would have imposed MANDATORY sentences for previously deported felon ILLEGALS who come back again.

Here is the list of Senators who supported it:

Alexander (R-TN), Yea
Ayotte (R-NH), Yea
Barrasso (R-WY), Yea
Blunt (R-MO), Yea
Boozman (R-AR), Yea
Burr (R-NC), Yea
Capito (R-WV), Yea
Cassidy (R-LA), Yea
Coats (R-IN), Yea
Cochran (R-MS), Yea
Collins (R-ME), Yea
Corker (R-TN), Yea
Cornyn (R-TX), Yea
Cotton (R-AR), Yea
Crapo (R-ID), Yea
Cruz (R-TX), Yea
Daines (R-MT), Yea
**Donnelly (D-IN), Yea
Enzi (R-WY), Yea
Ernst (R-IA), Yea
Fischer (R-NE), Yea
Flake (R-AZ), Yea
Gardner (R-CO), Yea
Grassley (R-IA), Yea
Hatch (R-UT), Yea
**Heitkamp (D-ND), Yea 
Heller (R-NV), Yea
Hoeven (R-ND), Yea
Inhofe (R-OK), Yea
Isakson (R-GA), Yea
Johnson (R-WI), Yea
Kirk (R-IL), Yea
Lankford (R-OK), Yea
**Manchin (D-WV), Yea 
McCain (R-AZ), Yea
McConnell (R-KY), Yea
Moran (R-KS), Yea
Murkowski (R-AK), Yea
Paul (R-KY), Yea
Perdue (R-GA), Yea
Portman (R-OH), Yea
Risch (R-ID), Yea
Roberts (R-KS), Yea
Rounds (R-SD), Yea
Rubio (R-FL), Yea
Sasse (R-NE), Yea
Scott (R-SC), Yea
Sessions (R-AL), Yea
Shelby (R-AL), Yea
Sullivan (R-AK), Yea
Thune (R-SD), Yea
Tillis (R-NC), Yea
Toomey (R-PA), Yea
Vitter (R-LA), Yea
Wicker (R-MS), Yea


THREE Democrats supported it! But it STILL FAILED!
========

Voted NO & want to protect ILLEGALS

Baldwin (D-WI), Nay
Bennet (D-CO), Nay
Blumenthal (D-CT), Nay
Booker (D-NJ), Nay
Boxer (D-CA), Nay
Cantwell (D-WA), Nay
Cardin (D-MD), Nay
Carper (D-DE), Nay
Casey (D-PA), Nay
Coons (D-DE), Nay
Durbin (D-IL), Nay
Feinstein (D-CA), Nay
Franken (D-MN), Nay
Gillibrand (D-NY), Nay
Heinrich (D-NM), Nay
Hirono (D-HI), Nay
Kaine (D-VA), Nay
**King (I-ME), Nay
Klobuchar (D-MN), Nay
Leahy (D-VT), Nay
Markey (D-MA), Nay
McCaskill (D-MO), Nay
Menendez (D-NJ), Nay
Merkley (D-OR), Nay
Mikulski (D-MD), Nay
Murphy (D-CT), Nay
Murray (D-WA), Nay
Nelson (D-FL), Nay
Peters (D-MI), Nay
Reed (D-RI), Nay
Reid (D-NV), Nay
**Sanders (I-VT), Nay
 Schatz (D-HI), Nay
Schumer (D-NY), Nay
Shaheen (D-NH), Nay
Stabenow (D-MI), Nay
Tester (D-MT), Nay
Udall (D-NM), Nay
Warner (D-VA), Nay
Warren (D-MA), Nay 
Whitehouse (D-RI), Nay
Wyden (D-OR), Nay


SKIPPED FROM VOTING ALL TOGETHER
Brown (D-OH), Not Voting
**Graham (R-SC), Not Voting
**Lee (R-UT), Not Voting

Weasels

Who Supports Sanctuary Cities??

You may want to know which US Senators support Sanctuary Cities. Here's a tally of their votes today:

Bill: Stop Dangerous Sanctuary Cities Act
A "YEA" supports and a "NAY" does not.

Here are the Senators who want to SHUT-Down Sanctuary Cities:
Alexander (R-TN), Yea
Ayotte (R-NH), Yea
Barrasso (R-WY), Yea
Blunt (R-MO), Yea
Boozman (R-AR), Yea
Burr (R-NC), Yea
Capito (R-WV), Yea
Cassidy (R-LA), Yea
Coats (R-IN), Yea
Cochran (R-MS), Yea
Collins (R-ME), Yea
Corker (R-TN), Yea
Cornyn (R-TX), Yea
Cotton (R-AR), Yea
Crapo (R-ID), Yea
Cruz (R-TX), Yea
Daines (R-MT), Yea
**Donnelly (D-IN), Yea
Enzi (R-WY), Yea
Ernst (R-IA), Yea
Fischer (R-NE), Yea
Flake (R-AZ), Yea
Gardner (R-CO), Yea
Grassley (R-IA), Yea
Hatch (R-UT), Yea
Heller (R-NV), Yea
Hoeven (R-ND), Yea
Inhofe (R-OK), Yea
Isakson (R-GA), Yea
Johnson (R-WI), Yea
Lankford (R-OK), Yea
**Manchin (D-WV), Yea
McCain (R-AZ), Yea
McConnell (R-KY), Yea
Moran (R-KS), Yea
Murkowski (R-AK), Yea
Paul (R-KY), Yea
Perdue (R-GA), Yea
Portman (R-OH), Yea
Risch (R-ID), Yea
Roberts (R-KS), Yea
Rounds (R-SD), Yea
Rubio (R-FL), Yea
Sasse (R-NE), Yea
Scott (R-SC), Yea
Sessions (R-AL), Yea
Shelby (R-AL), Yea
Sullivan (R-AK), Yea
Thune (R-SD), Yea
Tillis (R-NC), Yea
Toomey (R-PA), Yea
Vitter (R-LA), Yea
Wicker (R-MS), Yea

Only 2 Democrats supported it!

Here are the BASTARDS who want ILLEGALS to have a safe place:

Baldwin (D-WI), Nay
Bennet (D-CO), Nay
Blumenthal (D-CT), Nay
Booker (D-NJ), Nay
Boxer (D-CA), Nay
Cantwell (D-WA), Nay
Cardin (D-MD), Nay
Carper (D-DE), Nay
Casey (D-PA), Nay
Coons (D-DE), Nay
Durbin (D-IL), Nay
Feinstein (D-CA), Nay
Franken (D-MN), Nay
Gillibrand (D-NY), Nay
Heinrich (D-NM), Nay
Heitkamp (D-ND), Nay
Hirono (D-HI), Nay
Kaine (D-VA), Nay
**King (I-ME), Nay 
**Kirk (R-IL), Nay
Klobuchar (D-MN), Nay
Leahy (D-VT), Nay
Markey (D-MA), Nay
McCaskill (D-MO), Nay
Menendez (D-NJ), Nay
Merkley (D-OR), Nay
Mikulski (D-MD), Nay
Murphy (D-CT), Nay
Murray (D-WA), Nay
Nelson (D-FL), Nay
Peters (D-MI), Nay
Reed (D-RI), Nay
Reid (D-NV), Nay
**Sanders (I-VT), Nay
Schatz (D-HI), Nay
Schumer (D-NY), Nay
Shaheen (D-NH), Nay
Stabenow (D-MI), Nay
Tester (D-MT), Nay
Udall (D-NM), Nay
Warner (D-VA), Nay
Warren (D-MA), Nay (alias Pocahontas) 
Whitehouse (D-RI), Nay
Wyden (D-OR), Nay

Here is the one TURNCOAT TRAITOR ("Republican") who Likes ILLEGALS!

Kirk (R-IL), Nay

Here are the ones who AVOIDED VOTING ALL TOGETHER:
Brown (D-OH), Not Voting
**Graham (R-SC), Not Voting 
**Lee (R-UT), Not Voting

COWARDS!



Sunday, July 3, 2016

Buy American Products & Services

Spending money is just-like VOTING. You may want to think before you buy. Here is a list of 20 companies that are NO LONGER American-owned:

  1. Budweiser: Anheuser-Busch InBev, sold to Belgium in 2008 for $52 billion.
  2. Motorola Mobility: Sold to Lenovo, China in 2014 for $2.9 billion.
  3. Smithfield Foods: Sold to Shanghai Group, China in 2013 for $7.1 billion.
  4. AMC Theaters: Sold to Dalian Wanda Group, China in 2012 for $2.6 billion.
  5. Ben & Jerry’s: Sold to Unilever - a British-Dutch Company in 2000 for $326 million.
  6. Burger King: Sold to 3G Capital, Brazil in 2010 for $3.3 billion.
  7. 7-Eleven: Sold to Seven & I holdings, Japan in 1991 for $1 billion.
  8. IBM P.C. Business: Sold to Lenovo, China in 2005 for $1.75 billion.
  9. Firestone: Sold to Bridgestone Corp, Japan in 1988 for $2.6 billion.
  10. John Hancock Financial: Sold to Manulife Financial Corporation, Canada in 2004 for $11 billion in stock.
  11. Holiday Inn: Sold to Bass PLC, United Kingdom in 1988 for $2.23 billion.
  12. Trader Joe’s: Sold to Aldi, Germany- Albrecht Family Trust in 1979 for an undisclosed amount.
  13. CITGO: Sold to PetrleĆ³s de Venezuela, Venezuela in 1990 for $290 Million.
  14. Gerber: Sold to Nestle, Switzerland in 2007 for $5.5. billion.
  15. Ingram Micro: Sold to Tianjin Tianhai Investment Development Co. in 2016 for $6.3 billion.
  16. General Electric: Sold to Qingdao Hair Co, China in 2016 for $5.4 billion.
  17. Legendary Entertainment Group: Sold to Dalian Wanda Group, China in 2016 for $3.5 billion.
  18. Purina: Sold to Nestle, Switzerland in 2001 for $10.3 billion.
  19. Good Humor: Sold to Thomas J. Lipton Company — Subsidiary of Unilever in 1961 for (Inknown amount).
  20. Lucky Strike: Sold to British American Tobacco (BAT) Industries in 1994 for $1 billion.

Will you STILL support them? Do you Care?




Monday, June 20, 2016

How Did YOUR Senator Vote?

Here are the results of today's vote on ANTI-GUN legislation: A Nay is in support of the 2nd Amendment. A "YEA" vote SCREWS law-abiding gun owners.  Yellow indicates TRAITORS AGAINST IT!

Alexander (R-TN), Nay
Ayotte (R-NH), Yea 
Baldwin (D-WI), Yea
Barrasso (R-WY), Nay
Bennet (D-CO), Yea 
Blumenthal (D-CT), Yea
Blunt (R-MO), Nay
Booker (D-NJ), Yea 
Boozman (R-AR), Nay
Boxer (D-CA), Yea 
Brown (D-OH), Yea 
Burr (R-NC), Nay
Cantwell (D-WA), Yea
Capito (R-WV), Nay
Cardin (D-MD), Yea
Carper (D-DE), Yea 
Casey (D-PA), Yea 
Cassidy (R-LA), Nay
Coats (R-IN), Nay
Cochran (R-MS), Nay
Collins (R-ME), Nay
Coons (D-DE), Yea 
Corker (R-TN), Nay
Cornyn (R-TX), Nay
Cotton (R-AR), Nay
Crapo (R-ID), Nay
Cruz (R-TX), Nay
Daines (R-MT), Nay
Donnelly (D-IN), Yea 
Durbin (D-IL), Yea 
Enzi (R-WY), Nay
Ernst (R-IA), Nay
Feinstein (D-CA), Yea
Fischer (R-NE), Nay
Flake (R-AZ), Nay
Franken (D-MN), Yea
Gardner (R-CO), Nay
Gillibrand (D-NY), Yea 
Graham (R-SC), Nay
Grassley (R-IA), Nay
Hatch (R-UT), Nay
Heinrich (D-NM), Yea 
Heitkamp (D-ND), Nay
Heller (R-NV), Nay
Hirono (D-HI), Yea 
Hoeven (R-ND), Nay
Inhofe (R-OK), Nay
Isakson (R-GA), Nay
Johnson (R-WI), Nay
Kaine (D-VA), Yea 
King (I-ME), Yea 
Kirk (R-IL), Yea 
Klobuchar (D-MN), Yea
Lankford (R-OK), Nay
Leahy (D-VT), Yea 
Lee (R-UT), Nay
Manchin (D-WV), Yea 
Markey (D-MA), Yea 
McCain (R-AZ), Nay
McCaskill (D-MO), Yea
McConnell (R-KY), Nay
Menendez (D-NJ), Yea 
Merkley (D-OR), Yea 
Mikulski (D-MD), Yea 
Moran (R-KS), Nay
Murkowski (R-AK), Nay
Murphy (D-CT), Yea 
Murray (D-WA), Yea 
Nelson (D-FL), Yea 
Paul (R-KY), Nay
Perdue (R-GA), Nay
Peters (D-MI), Yea 
Portman (R-OH), Nay
Reed (D-RI), Yea 
Reid (D-NV), Yea 
Risch (R-ID), Nay
Roberts (R-KS), Nay
Rounds (R-SD), Nay
Rubio (R-FL), Nay
Sanders (I-VT), Yea 
Sasse (R-NE), Nay
Schatz (D-HI), Yea 
Schumer (D-NY), Yea
Scott (R-SC), Nay
Sessions (R-AL), Nay
Shaheen (D-NH), Yea 
Shelby (R-AL), Nay
Stabenow (D-MI), Yea
Sullivan (R-AK), Nay
Tester (D-MT), Yea 
Thune (R-SD), Nay
Tillis (R-NC), Nay
Toomey (R-PA), Nay
Udall (D-NM), Yea
Vitter (R-LA), Nay
Warner (D-VA), Yea 
Warren (D-MA), Yea   NO SURPRISE HERE!
Whitehouse (D-RI), Yea
Wicker (R-MS), Nay
Wyden (D-OR), Yea

Tuesday, May 24, 2016

Get Active or Quit Complaining!

If you don't SPEAK-OUT, America will never forgive you.  Don't look now, but you have a voice in the next presidential election.  If you remain silent or if you stay at home, you will  be responsible for the fate of America.

Your grandchildren will remember this election.  They will blame YOU for not caring what happens to America. Do you even care?

This election will select the next president who will nominate the next three Supreme Court Justices. It's clear, that if Hillary gets elected, she will nominate justices who will DESTROY the 2nd Amendment.  Do you care, or are you one of the politically correct IDIOTS who are "Gun-o-phobic"?

Under Obama, we have seen what a pacifist president policies have done for America.  He has weakened our positions in the world to the point that our enemies see out inactions and reply to become more HATEFUL and destructive.

We (America) need a LEADER- not the pathetic pacifist like Obama! We have been disgraced, and disrespected more under Obama than under ANY other president and he loves it.

We need a REAL leader instead of a guy who threatened, runs, and hides. Americans are SICK of losing and want to see a True leader.

Bernie is a disaster.  He promises everything for free that only taxpayers will pay for.  He wants the government to decide who gets why.  How much, and who pays. That's NOT America. Besides, we are running-out of money!

Get smart. Vote.  Vote for change or America as we knew it will die.

Sunday, May 8, 2016

Google is Watching & Tracking

Everything you search for on the Internet is being tracked - especially if you use Google. If you care about your privacy (what's left of it), shouldn't you be in charge? Why not?

Here's how
 You can access your record of web activity and delete all search records. Unfortunately, you can only delete several days at a time. Simply go to the following link and login: https://history.google.com/history/

The following screen displays:



Scroll down and see what your searches were. Select the ones you want to delete and confirm to complete the operation.

After deleting your unwanted record of searches, why not avoid this altogether?

Ghostery.com
There is a free application that tells you who's tracking you. Go to https://www.ghostery.com/why-ghostery/for-individuals/ and download the app. You can decide who does/does not track your web browsing.

StartPage.com
There is another application that keeps your privacy protected. It's called "StartPage." StartPage keeps advertisers away from you and it hides your searches from Google. You can install it on your computer, or you cell phone. Go to Startpage.com It REALLY WORKS!

What are you waiting for? Protect yourself today!




Sunday, March 27, 2016

Privacy Invasion or Police State?

It Never Stops
If you  think your privacy IS important, then pay attention. Law enforcement is "DEMANDING" people who have private DNA databases to yield their information for the new POLICE STATE that is growing in the US. Much like the Apple computer fiasco, police are overstepping their authority by commanding cooperation with no legal basis for doing so. Apple refuses to give police the "key" to unlock their phones.

Police departments across the US are aware that thousands of individuals have paid $200 to $300 to have their genetic material analyzed to determine family lineage. Ancestry.com is one of the most popular of these entities. Ancestry has cooperated with police and released genetic details on several customers whom the police were interested in investigating. They did so without asking for the customer's permission. Where's the privacy protection? There is NONE!

The police can and do, use this information much like fingerprints at crime scenes to prosecute individuals. It's like the "black box" that's installed in all new cars. The recorded information can, and IS used in accident cases AGAINST the drivers.

OK, you say you have nothing to hide because you're NOT a criminal. That's NOT the point! What's happening is the blatant deterioration of your privacy and the destruction of the 4th Amendment (ILLEGAL SEARCH AND SEIZURE). The police in these examples do NOT have any search warrants and are truly INVADING individual privacy unilaterally. AND, the bad thing is that the companies who have your private information are freely giving it to the police.

Bottom Line
Don't pay to have your genetic material analyzed. It can be used against you without ANY LEGAL MEANS! Insurance companies would LOVE to know your genetic information so they can raise your rates because of risk of specific diseases. They may be the next to "demand" your information.

Why take the risk?




Sunday, March 20, 2016

GOP Elites Continue to Ignore

This past week the Republican Party leadership IGNORED their constituents AND their Conservative principles. They sold-out their Republican base and allowed Obama's choice for Education Secretary.

John King is a staunch supporter of Common Core in spite of the fact that Conservatives want the States in charge of their own education curriculum. Thank Mitch McConnell once again for being Obama's best buddy.

Under McConnell and John Boehner (both TRAITORs to Conservative principles), the US Congress dropped their promise to lower spending by passing the Omnibus Spending bill. They funded ObamaCare and allowed it to expand coverage for ILLEGALS. They refused to pass Kate's Law because it may offend ILLEGALS. They renewed the Patriot Act which STEALS personal freedoms for the sake of protection. They renewed the National Defense Authorization Act that ILLEGALLY gives our military the power to arrest US citizens and hold them indefinitely without benefit of a lawyer.

Yes, Congress has been busy. The Establishment continues to drive America into the ground and there is NO ACCOUNTABILITY for their incompetent actions.

SO when you have a chance to vote, this is your last chance to try and fix the problems facing the nation. VOTE-OUT ALL INCUMBENTS. If they have served more that 2 terms, they all need to go. They are the reason America is going in the WRONG DIRECTION. Don't keep re-electing these BASTARDS!



Sunday, February 28, 2016

Choose Wisely - NOT Emotionally

Voting based on ANGER is NOT the best way to select your presidential candidate. In fact, it's dangerous. Hold-on. We're ALL MAD at the establishment politicians in both parties. We have good reason for this. They are corrupt, greedy, and power hungry. They have all betrayed their constituents and we are finally so upset that we are NOT thinking but letting our emotions rule instead.

We have candidates on both sides that we would probably NEVER consider if we weren't so disgusted with the establishment politicians. That alone should run-up the RED Flag. However, primary voters (so far) are NOT thinking. That's the problem.

On the Democrat side we have a Socialist Senator who wants to give everybody everything and make a small percentage pay for it. The other candidate is NOT trustworthy and is being seriously being investigated for possible federal crimes. The Republicans have reduced their numbers to three contenders. One establishment candidate who supports AMNESTY, one who was a Democrat and donated to many LIBERALS over the years. That one doesn't discuss his support for the Constitution. He avoids it. The other candidate has no friends in the Senate because he has defended the Constitution which they continueally keep trashing.

If you actually stop and think, you may surprise yourself at your candidate selection. Does your choice candidate fit with your political views. What is their history? What is their temperament? Why do you REALLY like them? Are they truly suited to be in charge of our nuclear weapons? Do they have a BAD temper? Are they "presidential?"

Some of the candidates have no real clue (even though they project that they do) about the specifics of the issues. Do they answer tough questions or do they beat around the bush by avoiding them? Listen carefully because the future of America depends on your selection.

The bottom line is don't be fooled again. America is at a turning point and we need someone who will protect your liberties and your freedoms while defending the Constitution. Of the three candidates, there IS one that fits the bill.

Choose wisely.



Sunday, February 21, 2016

We've Been Duped

Seriously, do you actually believe that Justice Scalia died from "natural causes"? The first thing reported concerning his death was "There was no foul play." REALLY? Isn't a death of a famous and important person usually announced saying that it "appears" as though they died of natural causes. We are usually given the benefit of the doubt until we see the results of an autopsy.

They found him with a pillow over his head. Don't you think that's a bit unusual?

The next thing that makes this look bad is the fact that NO DOCTOR ever looked at Scalia's body. They just announced that he died from a "heart attack." How do they know this if the body was NEVER examined? A Crystal Ball?

Motives for Murder
What are the motives to kill Scalia? Justice Scalia was going to participate on these rulings:

  •  A case that would either reinforce ObamaCare or not.
  •  A case that challenges Obama forcing religious affiliations to provide birth control
  •  An affirmative action case from the University of Texas
  •  A case involving non-union members being forced to support a union they didn't like
  •  A ruling on the Death Penalty
  •  A ruling on at least one case regarding Abortion

Other than that, there are no motives by anyone on the LEFT for getting rid of a man who strongly supported the Constitution. Think about it!

We're being duped. It's just that simple.



Sunday, February 14, 2016

Media Manipulation

It's quite apparent that the media is controlling the presidential elections to the best of their ability. Control the media and you control the public.  For example, they excluded Carly Fiorina from the top tier debates based on their criteria.  Then they dropped her from competing altogether.  Score one for the media.  Voters had no input.  The media made that decision for you!

Trump got it right when he said that the debate audiences were stacked with political donors.  Last night's debate clearly had an audience that was Pro-Rubio.  They boo'd Trump several times and applauded Rubio often.  So who are the audience members?  How do they get their tickets?  Where do they come from?  Should you be concerned?  Yes!

Another example of media controlling presidential campaigns is this:  The Public Broadcasting Service (PBS) sponsored the last Democratic Debates.  PBS is a by a TAXPAYER funded corporation.  Why should we foot the bill?  REALLY?  AND, more importantly, how come there have been no Democratic debates sponsored by Fox News? The results of the Democratic debates would have a different outcome.

Speaking of the last Democratic debates, we observed that Rachel Maddow (an MSNBC moderator) actually showed her bias when she hugged Hillary and Bernie after the debate process. Incidentally, there were NO questions directed to Hillary about her FBI investigation and the alleged violations of nation security laws. This is a method of protecting their favorite candidate. So much for their least favorite - Bernie.

Conclusion: Don't be fooled by the PROPAGANDA we are being fed. It's a dog-and-pony-show, but you're not supposed to notice.






Sunday, February 7, 2016

GOP Debate

Last night was important. John Kasich said earlier that he should run as a Democrat. He's right, because he sounds just like one! He supports Common Core, Planned Parenthood, and other popular Leftist positions. Thanks John for making that all clear last night. We now know that you're REALLY a Moderate Democrat in Republican clothes. Go join Hillary and Bernie where you belong.

The BIGGEST LOOSER was RINO Rubio. We don't feel too sad about that because he betrayed the Tea Party voters who elected him to the US Senate. Rubio worked with the Gang of Eight to pass legislation that gives AMNESTY to ILLEGALS. Rubio hasn't ANY good explanation for this support. When he realized that he lost Tea Party supporters, he dumped the idea. He has no scruples! Last night Rubio showed that he cannot think on his feet. He looked like a deer in the headlights and was dumbfounded. He couldn't carry on a conversation because he was programed to give specific talking points no matter what happened. It didn't work. When challenged with questions he couldn't answer, he kept repeating the same rehearsed non-answer. It was so obvious, that it was embarrassing. Oh well. That should help him get knocked-down a notch or two where he belongs. He's NOT qualified to become President.

This ties-in together with Rubio's recent political endorsements. For example, Rick Santorum on live TV, couldn't list ANY achievements by Rubio as Senator! That's some endorsement! Perhaps it's because he has NONE! That makes you wonder what favors Rubio is calling-in from the Establishment GOP to help give him a boost in a close contest. The Establishment sees that their number one (JEB BUSH) is doing poorly and so they are now helping their OTHER Establishment candidate (Rubio). If you don't like career politicians, then Rubio should be off your list.

Trump on the other hand, didn't damage himself even though he managed to insult the audience a couple of times. They answered Trump with boos, which he sloughed-off. In spite of an argument with Bush over eminent domain, Trump succeeded in doing a decent job debating.

Ted Cruz clearly explained what happened in Iowa dispelling the Media's misrepresentation of the facts. He publicly and sincerely apologized to Ben Carson for the improprieties directed towards Carson in the Iowa Caucuses, showing Cruz has some class. Cruz did well and should be happy with his performance.

Other than one challenge against Trump, Jeb Bush did OK, but seriously, he doesn't have a chance at the nomination. He has oodles of money because he is the Establishment's first choice and that's the main reason why people don't like him! He's already bough and paid for and is part of the problem. He's a career politician and people don't want that this time around.

Chris Christie totally surprised Rubio and showed how he has way more energy than most other candidates - except Trump. However, Christie won't make the final cut either. Too little - too late. He was great in showing Rubio's weaknesses, but that won't be enough for him to win the nomination.

Ben Carson complained about the improprieties in Iowa (directed at Cruz). Other than that,  he made no significant remarks that would give him the help he desperately needs to move up. Sorry Ben, you're a man of integrity, but that's not enough to get to the White House this time around.

So it still looks like Trump is on top. Time will tell.



Wednesday, January 27, 2016

Master Manipulator

Don't look now, but you're being hoodwinked once again. The Trump campaign announced that he would NOT attend the Thursday evening debate because he doesn't want Megyn Kelly to moderate because she's unfair to him. REALLY? What's he REALLY afraid of?

Fox News refused to replace Kelly. (Good for them!)

Today we see Donald Trump polling on the Internet asking his followers if he should attend the debate. He's jerking us all around while getting free airtime and free publicity.

Let's face it, he is MANIPULATING the media and YOU once again. Is this the type of temperament we want to see displayed from the White House? Trump may be masterful in getting his own way, but what happens when he doesn't? Looks like he throws a HISSY FIT.

Can we trust Trump after this unscrupulous behavior?? Does he belong in charge of the nuclear codes?

When he shows up tomorrow, we will have proof that it was all a SHAM.


Sunday, January 24, 2016

Trump's Definition of "Conservative"

When asked what is a Conservative on CBS’s Face the Nation, Donald Trump responded as follows:

Question: “What is your definition of conservative?”

TRUMP: “Well, I think it’s a person that doesn’t want to take risks. I think that’s a good thing. A person that wants to in terms of government I’m talking about. Person that wants to conserve, a person that wants to in financial sense balance budgets. A person that feels strongly about the military and I feel very strong low about the military. And you have some of these Amy they don’t even want to focus on the military. Our military is falling apart I feel very — I have always felt very strongly about the military. By the way, if you look at vision, the word vision, I was the one that said, take the oil, I’ve been saying that for years, take the oil, let’s take the oil. Nobody would listen then all of a sudden after Paris they started saying maybe that’s right we’ll take the oil. They still don’t take the proper way. I was — which is a little bit different than Normal conservative. But I was very much opposed to the war in Iraq. Lot of these guys were all for the war in Iraq look what’s that has got it. Spent $2 trillion, now handing Iraq over, just handing over to Iran. Iran is going to take over Iraq I said that was going to happen. I said that years ago. In 2003 that Iran will take over Iraq was largest oil reserves in the world that’s not a conservative position. When I was saying, don’t go into Iraq I’m a very militaristic person, I’m very much into the military, will build our military better and stronger, that’s the — opposed to what we have now. I was opposed to the war in Iraq. Most conservatives, let’s go gung-ho. Everyone of them wanted the war in Iraq. Look where it got us.

Merriam-Webster brief definition of Conservative: 
a :  of or relating to a philosophy of conservatism
b capitalized :  of or constituting a political party professing the principles of conservatism: as

  • (1) :  of or constituting a party of the United Kingdom advocating support of established institutions 
  • (2) :  progressive conservative
  • 3a :  tending or disposed to maintain existing views, conditions, or institutions :  traditional
  • 3b :  marked by moderation or caution
  • 3c :  marked by or relating to traditional norms of taste, elegance, style, or manners
  • 4 :  of, relating to, or practicing Conservative Judaism

Merriam-Webster full definition of Conservative

  • 1a :  an adherent or advocate of political conservatism
  • 1b    capitalized :  a member or supporter of a conservative political party
  • 2a :  one who adheres to traditional methods or views
  • 2b :  a cautious or discreet person

Does his definition even come close? Any Questions?

Beware!

Sunday, January 17, 2016

VETTING TRUMP

Enthusiasm is a wonderful thing. It elected Barack Hussein Obama as our president. Look where we are today. America is heading on the WRONG DIRECTION!

Do you want to make the SAME MISTAKE AGAIN? Isn't it time to vet Trump? Although Trump is and has been the leader in the polls, we haven't taken the time to check-out the REAL Donald Trump and where he stands on the issues.

Here is a brief summary of some of his positions:

ABORTION: In the past he was "Very Pro-choice," not so much any more.

PLANNED PARENTHOOD: Trump feels that abortions shouldn't receive any taxpayer dollars, BUT “I would look at the good aspects of [Planned Parenthood], and I would also look because I’m sure they do some things properly and good for women. I would look at that, and I would look at other aspects also, but we have to take care of women.” That's having it BOTH WAYS!

RELIGIOUS CONTROLS IMPOSED BY GOVERNMENT: Trump supports the Supreme Court decision to legitimize religious discrimination against people who practice their faith. He says "You have to go with it. The decision’s been made, and that is the law of the land."

COLLEGE LOANS: He says "The federal government should not make money on student loans because so many students face crushing debt." This is the PROGRESSIVE POSITION!

UNIONS: Trump indicates that he is NOT a strong supporter of workers rights in states without right-to-work laws, when he says "Collective bargaining doesn’t bother me so much." So he's Pro-Union (Private and Public).

WELFARE REFORM: Trump has downplayed that reform would be necessary. This means that things would remain the same as they are now.

SOCIAL SECURITY: He wants to raise the retirement age to 70.

HEALTHCARE: He supports universal health care funded by HIGHER corporate taxes. He like the Single Payer system found in Canada. He wants a government subsidized system.

GOVERNMENT OVERREACH: Trump supported "some elements of the Obama Administration’s agenda of government overreach" and praised the Obama appointment of the activist former Obama EPA Administrator, Lisa Jackson.

WASHINGTON CRONYISM: He understands how to take advantage of government policy to benefit HIS bottom line. He offers little reason that he would do much to rein in government favoritism. He got rich using this system.

GOVERNMENT INTERVENTION: Trump supports empowering cronyists in the federal government to provide funds to the favored projects of well-connected special interests - just like Obama did with the failed Solyndra. This is personal gain at taxpayer's expense.

IMMIGRATION: He agrees that ILLEGALS should have a "Path" to legalization (CITIZENSHIP or AMNESTY) based on his unexplained "merit system."

These are a few examples on where Trump stands. These are NOT Conservative positions. They are PROGRESSIVE positions! He rarely - if ever - cites protecting the Constitution. That should bother you if you are a Conservative.



Sunday, January 3, 2016

Time Is Running Out

We now have anarchy in Oregon. Armed citizens have taken over government buildings and vow to remain for "as long as it takes" to protect ranchers. We have a Black Mississippi city councilman inciting black residents to throw rocks and antagonize police. We have Black Lives Matter groups challenging police departments all over trying to incite violence. There are mass shootings in Chicago on a daily basis.

What's next?

This plays right into Obama's script. He's going to challenge the 2nd Amendment by re-writing gun laws. He has no REAL powers to do so. He will STEAL THEM like he has before. He wants citizens to be unarmed because that makes it easier for the government to control masses of Americans.

Martial Law can become a reality if this continues. Martial Law eliminates ALL freedoms! Obama would remain in office past his term if this happens. There wouldn't be any presidential elections. This would be the end of America as we know it.

This is becoming close to reality. In seven years, Obama has eliminated military leaders who would NOT shoot Americans. The military has been training to go door-to-door in "exercises." Why? To control anarchy.

It's not too late. It's time to push-back. Don't allow the President pursue dashing our freedoms. Voice your opinions or loose your freedoms.