Saturday, January 9, 2010

Why a National "Coalition" is Needed...

What is a Coalition?
A coalition is an alliance among individuals and groups, during which they cooperate in joint action, each in his own self interest.

The 912 Coalition Community is not a replacement for any group, website or organization. Our effort is to build consensus and provide a format for unified action among the various groups and individuals that become Coalition Supporters.

Joining Forces For a Common Cause
A coalition empowers the individual and the member groups.

Do you believe in the Constitution and The Bill of Rights?
  • Do you believe in the Principles and Values they represent?
  • Do you want to make a difference?
The National 912 Coalition fills the void between the large national organization which focus on building their own organizations and smaller local activist groups working directly in their local communities.

The coalition is made up of individual citizens and local grassroots groups... it is not sponsored or supported by any Political Party, PAC, Washington Lobbying Groups, or IRS Regulated 501(c) organizations.

The Coalition empowers the local activist and groups by allowing them to work directly and indirectly with similar groups and individuals across the country without losing their individual personalities or organizational structures.

Unite or Die - Preserving the Grassroots Movement
As the larger National Organizations look to co-opt as much of the movement as they can... drawing resources and manpower from smaller local groups... the smaller (and more effective) local groups like 912 and Tea Party Groups are weakened.

By united as a coalition, and having a "National" voice and the ability to attract more supporters through a national awareness campaign, and the collective resources of the coalition, local groups across the country can become empower.

No One Group Can Do It Alone!
While there have been many local groups that have formed across the country as a result of the 912 Project and the Tea party Movement, no single group or individual will ever be able achieve the multitude of goals and objectives the "movement" has come to represent.

Groups must be able to work together to achieve more faster, it is time for a coalition... and it was because of this need The Coalition Was Born!

The Coalition Community allows their voices to be combined with others across the country who share the same goals and objectives even the smallest of local groups can represent the hundreds of thousands across the country!

The 912 Coalition is a place were you can find like-minded Americans looking to take action and join together to restore the Constitutional Principles and Values that our great country was founded on.

Become a supporter of The Coalition and help us Take Back America One Community at a Time... Click Here to become a Coalition Supporter.

Friday, January 8, 2010

2010 Tea Party Resolutions

1. Stop the carbon tax (Cap & Trade) and the nationalization of the energy and transportation sectors of the economy.

2. Stop the government takeover of hospitals, the government control of doctors, and the destruction of the best health care system in the world.

3. Demand fiscal responsibility at all levels of government. During hard times the bureaucrats need to cut back spending like the rest of us have to do.

4. Roll-back the onerous regulations and crushing taxes which are killing small businesses and making it impossible to start new ones.

5. Vote the socialists, progressives, Democrats, Republicans, and power-hungry elitists out of office no matter what party they're in.

6. Actively fight for our rights – including property rights – wherever and whenever they are threatened.

Thursday, January 7, 2010

How Radicals Fight

The formal Progressive Party was founded by the Communists in 1948 to oppose Harry Truman's bid for election because he opposed Joseph Stalin. The Communists NEVER referred to themselves as Communists, they were (and are still called) "progressives." The progressive movement has existed for over 100 years. The Progressive Party was led by FDR's Vice President, Henry Wallace. We now have a strong Progressive Caucus in Congress which has helped radicals reach new levels of power in government.

Radicals never refer to themselves as "radicals," "Marxists," or "Communists." Instead they call themselves, "liberals," "new leftists," "social justice advocates," or "progressives." However, they remain what they are - radicals who want to "overthrow" government for their concept of Utopia.

Today, radicals use both strategies outlined in yesterday's blog (Cloward & Piven and Saul Alinsky's methodology). They deceive others and call themselves "progressives" so as not to upset or awaken Americans that they are being manipulated. Socialists will try and impersonate liberals. Liberals pass themselves off as as progressives, and so on... It's all smoke and mirrors. It's all lies and make believe. It's also not a new tactic. The Communists used deception during the 1930's to pretend to be liberals.

Radicals also use lying as a tool to disarm opponents by pretending to be moderate or liberal. Example 1: Includes Al Sharpton, Bill Ayers, and Jeremiah Wright. They all pose as something other than what they really are. Sharpton and Wright profess to be civil rights activists. Ayers poses as a patriotic progressive. Their underlying agenda is quite different than what they actually expose. Example 2: Obama ran as a moderate Democrat. His actions and policies show that he too is a radical.

Why do radicals (progressives) believe that America is bad and want to destroy it? Because radicals are not comparing America to other REAL societies. Instead, they are comparing America to the "Utopia" that they think they are creating and building. Anything compared to their idea is BAD and that's why they hate America. But they DO hate America and want to change it. Don't loose sight it that.

Radicals speak about "social justice," "democracy," and "equality." These things can never satisfy the radical's fantasies. They literally want to destroy the wealth, prosperity, and goodness because it trumps their dream of a heaven on earth. They always want the government to create new entitlements for more government control over individuals. They believe Karl Marx when he said "Everything that exists deserves to perish." Thus, they are willing to destroy the institutions, structures, and values that sustain the society we live in. They also dislike religion because it changes the focus away from their goals and agendas. Hence, many are atheists. They believe in the State, not God.

Radicals never pay attention to the consequences of their actions.
Example 1: The philosophy of the "Great Society" destroyed inner city black families and has created countless fatherless children and created poverty of untold measure. It also has created a violent underclass which is a serious threat today. It also created new entitlement programs that have been total failures. Radicals totally ignore this and take no responsibility for it. In fact, they really don't even care about it.

Example 2: The Environmentalist movement in the 1960's - 1970's lead to the banning of DDT which in-turn has caused world-wide outbreaks of malaria just as it was being eradicated. These results have never been looked at as results of this ban. They never considered the long-term consequences of their actions.

Radicals also rely heavily on the "art of miscommunication" to fool and deceive their opponents. Don't sell Socialism as "Socialism". Instead call it something else that is less recognizable, like "progressivism," or "social justice," or "economic democracy." People will listen to these names and not be turned-off. Never turn-off the opposition by directly confronting it. (Never use the word "fascism" because it turns-off too many people because the word is misunderstood and confused by many). Join the opposition and undermine it from within slowly over time. Infiltrate as a passive revolutionary using a non-challenging approach so you can sell your ideas of "A Change We Can Believe in" and "Yes We Can" along with the "Audacity of Hope."

Radicals have learned that in order to advance their goals of more power, they needed to camouflage them. So they changed from being openly violent to become part of the system and work with it from within to destroy it. Angela Davis, Bill Ayers, and Bernadine Dohrn (to name just a few), left their violent activities of the 60's to go underground into the US college systems as professors. No wonder our youths are so "progressive" in their thinking. They are being brainwashed in college by "old" radical professors. This secret strategy is called "boring from within."

Here is law Professor Obama teaching Alinsky's method:

Revolutionary change cannot be done like our Founding Fathers devised. Present radicals must conduct their agenda through deception. It's OK to be unethical. The means justify the ends. Don't let your opponents know you are at war with them. Thus, you can gain compromises and commitments to "peaceful" conflict resolutions. Just keep on passively attacking - little by little, making progress - never wavering. Keep attacking bit by bit. Do it in increments, but do it. This explains what this country has been facing for the past 100 years. Progressives (radicals) have been at work for at least that long.

Name calling is a definite strategy. It serves as a means to literally destroy opposition by stigmatizing them. Demonizing and discrediting individuals by isolating and attacking them was proposed by Alinsky. That's why we have seen Tea Party goers called "Truthers," "Birthers," "Tea Bag Terrorists," "Teabaggers," "Extremists," "Racists," un-American," Astro Turf," "Tea Party "Activists," "Oath Keepers," "Nazis," "Evil Mongers," "Right-wing Militias," and "Aryan groups" just to name a few. Name calling does not rely on the truth. It ignores facts and logic to discredit. Radicals are not playing, because they are at war with you.

Action To Take
Understand that YOU need to become part of the solution. You cannot remain passive any longer. YOU need to become politically active. YOU need to join the 912 Project or a local Tea Party. We are 10 months away from the mid-term elections. Do something to help make the Take-Back-America movement successful.

We need to get our country back. America is being changed while we sit and watch. We need to get those who are in office, out of office. All of them. There is so much corruption, deceit, and dishonesty, that you cannot trust the current elected officials. They are promoting their own agenda - NOT YOURS! We need to mobilize the grass root Tea Parties to help bring-down the system of corruption and deception in Washington. We need to replace the people who serve the special interests with those who serve their constituents instead.

Wednesday, January 6, 2010

We are in a Fight

If you believe that the Founding Fathers had it right, then you need to realize a few things. We are in a war. A struggle between two different entities. America will never be the same. We are loosing.

Understanding the Enemy
First, you need to understand that the people in Washington are promoting their own agendas for their own goals. Namely, they all want more power. They are corrupted by power. They want to change America as we know it. They want to bring-down capitalism. They want government control over all facets of your life. Consequently, they do what they want to do and ignore those who put them in office. You don't matter to them. They believe that they know what's good for you. Besides, they have special interests and PACs that they need to keep happy because they're the ones who paid for their elections.

Second, we are a divided nation - not by political parties but by political ideologies. We are not separated by Democrats, Republicans and Independents. We are separated by political theories. Tea Party goers believe in the values that our Founding Fathers had to create the United States. These are fundamentally conservative values. The Democrat and Republican parties no longer represent the original values or ideologies that their respective parties were founded. Both have been permeated by progressive ideologies. Neither party stands for the original values that were their building blocks when the parties were formed.

Progressive Resistance
Throughout history progressives have faced strong resistance from conservatives who do not want government controls over social and economic systems. Progressives want unions, reformers, socialists, radicals, communists, and anarchists. Progressives want to take power away from the traditional power brokers and give to the have nots. They want to re-distribute wealth. Progressives believe in "social justice" and "equality." They want to destroy capitalism and democracy as we know it. Their vision is somewhat Utopian. Our current administration is just that. - strongly progressive.

Progressives or Radicals?
The radical progressives of the 60's promoted a violent overtake of existing government. We saw the creation of several violent organizations that all promoted the overthrow of the government. They failed. However, a few progressives saw different approaches to achieve the same goals without violence. Richard Cloward and his wife Francis Piven, both professors at Columbia University, devised a strategy of destroying capitalism without the use of violence. Their strategy seeks to hasten the fall of capitalism by overloading the government bureaucracy by making a flood of impossible demands. This in-turn would cause society into a crisis and economic collapse. This system works even better during times of crisis! Thus, the downfall of capitalism.

Obvious example of the Cloward-Piven Theory in practice: ACORN was founded by believers of this strategy. They are at work today by promoting invalid voter registrations from dead people or by non-existent people. Thus opening the door to unprecedented voter fraud and record complaints against the system of voter disenfranchisement. These are the forces at work in our present government. They exist to bring-down the system.

In addition to the work of Cloward and Piven, there was a man named Saul Alinsky. In the 1930's he gained a strong reputation for "organizing" which was his euphemism for "revolution." He was a Communist/Marxist radical who identified a set of rules for ordinary people to follow to gain power. He created a blueprint for revolution under the banner of "social change." (Tomorrow we explain what the deception means and why he uses them). He wanted to see a complete collapse of America's social and economic structure (the destruction of capitalism). Alinsky wanted to see radical leaders (charismatic radical organizers) project confidence and vision to profess societal changes that were needed ("A Change We Can Believe In"). His process was to infiltrate and gain control slowly over time.

Two of Alinsky's strident followers were Hillary Rodam Clinton and Barack Hussein Obama. Hillary interviewed Alinsky while writing a paper about him in college in 1969. She became an ardent follower of his. Obama, although never meeting Alinsky, did in fact train under him at Alinsky's Industrial Areas Foundation in Chicago, IL. Obama went on to work for ACORN and train members in Alinsky's methods. He continues to support ACORN.

Now these individuals are in control of our national government. No wonder Americans feel uncomfortable. They see changes that are "radical" and Americans are beginning to wake-up that this is NOT the change they wanted to see. We have Communists and Marxists working as advisers to the President. These are not accidents in the vetting process. They are deliberate. They support the goals, beliefs, and directions of the administration. People working for this administration look up to Mau Tse Tung and Lennin as their spiritual leaders.

Tomorrow's Lead...
How Radicals Fight

Tuesday, January 5, 2010

The "O" World

Here are a few cartoons to enjoy. Credits are given in the cartoons.

China vs. America in the Future

Upcoming New York Trials


Government Control

Monday, January 4, 2010

Reprint from Charles Krauthammer

Rather than paraphrase a worthy article by Pulitzer Prize winner Charles Krauthammer regarding our government's attitude towards terrorism, it's much better to see the entire article. This is REALLY worth reading!

"Hollow Words on Terrorism"
By Charles Krauthammer

"WASHINGTON -- Janet Napolitano -- former Arizona governor, now overmatched secretary of homeland security -- will forever be remembered for having said of the attempt to bring down an airliner over Detroit: "The system worked." The attacker's concerned father had warned U.S. authorities about his son's jihadist tendencies. The would-be bomber paid cash and checked no luggage on a transoceanic flight. He was nonetheless allowed to fly, and would have killed 288 people in the air alone, save for a faulty detonator and quick actions by a few passengers.

Heck of a job, Brownie.

The reason the country is uneasy about the Obama administration's response to this attack is a distinct sense of not just incompetence but incomprehension. From the very beginning, President Obama has relentlessly tried to downplay and deny the nature of the terrorist threat we continue to face. Napolitano renames terrorism "man-caused disasters." Obama goes abroad and pledges to cleanse America of its post-9/11 counterterrorist sins. Hence, Guantanamo will close, CIA interrogators will face a special prosecutor, and Khalid Sheik Mohammed will bask in a civilian trial in New York -- a trifecta of political correctness and image management.

And just to make sure even the dimmest understand, Obama banishes the term "war on terror." It's over -- that is, if it ever existed.

Obama may have declared the war over. Unfortunately al-Qaeda has not. Which gives new meaning to the term "asymmetric warfare."

And produces linguistic -- and logical -- oddities that littered Obama's public pronouncements following the Christmas Day attack. In his first statement, Obama referred to Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab as "an isolated extremist." This is the same president who, after the Ford Hood shooting, warned us "against jumping to conclusions" -- code for daring to associate Nidal Hasan's mass murder with his Islamist ideology. Yet, with Abdulmutallab, Obama jumped immediately to the conclusion, against all existing evidence, that the bomber acted alone.

More jarring still were Obama's references to the terrorist as a "suspect" who "allegedly tried to ignite an explosive device." You can hear the echo of FDR: "Yesterday, December 7, 1941 -- a date which will live in infamy -- Japanese naval and air force suspects allegedly bombed Pearl Harbor."

Obama reassured the nation that this "suspect" had been charged. Reassurance? The president should be saying: We have captured an enemy combatant -- an illegal combatant under the laws of war: no uniform, direct attack on civilians -- and now to prevent future attacks, he is being interrogated regarding information he may have about al-Qaeda in Yemen.

Instead, Abdulmutallab is dispatched to some Detroit-area jail and immediately lawyered up. At which point -- surprise! -- he stops talking.

This absurdity renders hollow Obama's declaration that "we will not rest until we find all who were involved." Once we've given Abdulmutallab the right to remain silent, we have gratuitously forfeited our right to find out from him precisely who else was involved, namely those who trained, instructed, armed and sent him.

This is all quite mad even in Obama's terms. He sends 30,000 troops to fight terror overseas, yet if any terrorists come to attack us here, they are magically transformed from enemy into defendant.

The logic is perverse. If we find Abdulmutallab in an al-Qaeda training camp in Yemen, where he is merely preparing for a terror attack, we snuff him out with a Predator -- no judge, no jury, no qualms. But if we catch him in the United States in the very act of mass murder, he instantly acquires protection not just from execution by drone but even from interrogation.

The president said that this incident highlights "the nature of those who threaten our homeland." But the president is constantly denying the nature of those who threaten our homeland. On Tuesday, he referred five times to Abdulmutallab (and his terrorist ilk) as "extremist(s)."

A man who shoots abortion doctors is an extremist. An eco-fanatic who torches logging sites is an extremist. Abdulmutallab is not one of these. He is a jihadist. And unlike the guys who shoot abortion doctors, jihadists have cells all over the world; they blow up trains in London, nightclubs in Bali and airplanes over Detroit (if they can); and are openly pledged to war on America.

Any government can through laxity let someone slip through the cracks. But a government that refuses to admit that we are at war, indeed, refuses even to name the enemy -- jihadist is a word banished from the Obama lexicon -- turns laxity into a governing philosophy."

Americans are NOT safe under this President. His agenda to take-over and federalize our national treasures (banks, automobile companies, insurance companies, national healthcare, and total energy consumption controls), are all a means to an end. POWER over individuals. All this while he ignores the fact that extremists are trying to kill all Americans. This is a dangerous unprecidented take-over of American liberties.

Sunday, January 3, 2010

Weekly Polls

The Rasmussen Reports is an independent electronic publishing firm that specializes in public opinion polling. Here are some current results on some main issues:

Presidential Tracking Poll
This tracks how the President is doing by those surveyed.
  • Strongly Approve... 24%
  • Strongly Disapprove... 42%
  • Approval Index = ... -18%

Presidential Approval Index
This chart is from

Job Approval Rating Since Election

Waterboard Airline Bomber?
Should the USA use waterboarding and other aggressive interrogation techniques to gain information from the terrorist who attempted to bomb the Detroit airliner on Christmas?
  • Agree we should ... 58%
  • Disagree we should not ...30%
  • Not sure ... 12%