Saturday, April 27, 2013

How Many Terrorists?

It's been reported by Fox News that Tamerlan Tsarnaev's wife, Katherine Russell Tsarnaeva may have aided and abetted her husband, Terrorist #1. The police are continuing to investigate how much Katherine actually knew about her husband's Terrorist activities. Was she involved in the act itself? Did she condone her husband's activities? Did she help manufacture the bombs? How much does she know about the planning of the bombings? Is she lying about knowing nothing?

The police believe she called husband Tamerlan (Terrorist #1) to let him know that the FBI was looking for him after she saw photos on the news. She says she knew nothing about it whatsoever. RIGHT! No wife ever tries to protect her husband.

Suppose it's true she knew nothing. Then we have a true paradox. Katherine has lawyered-up. Isn't that a bit odd? If you have NOTHING to hide, why would you need a lawyer? All of her public records are sealed by Governor Deval Patrick (D, MA). Why is this? What are they hiding here? She and Tamerlan were on welfare. If she were NOT a converted Muslim wouldn't these public records be readily available? Governor Patrick claims that she and the entire family have a "right to privacy." Are you buying this excuse? We are talking about multiple deaths and hundreds of injured persons by a terrorist activity, and he protects their privacy!

Shouldn't this woman be held for questioning WITHOUT MIRANDA? Who's side in OUR government really on? We see a real mis-mash of using the law for some things and NOT using the law for others. It's OK for the police to go door-to-door forcing homeowners out of their homes by gunpoint, body-searching them, and detaining them, but we cannot divulge the Tsarnaev's public records as welfare recipients. That makes no logical sense what-so-ever.

Don't accept these lame excuses coming from the government. We are NOT getting the TRUTH. Demand answers.

Friday, April 26, 2013

Obama's Newest Cover-Up

President Obama's policies on counter-terrorism in reality, are more like PRO-Terrorism.

Here's why: He refuses to call the two bombing terrorists, Muslim Jihadists. This is in spite of the fact that they are both classified as such by themselves and Terrorist 1's own website postings.

President Obama told Americans that the war on terror is over. Keep in mind that under Obama's watch, there have been at least 10 terrorist attacks against Americans. Obama refuses to concede that there are people of a religious group who want and DO kill Americans whenever they can.

The most illustrative of Obama's failed anti-terrorist tactics is his latest trick. While the FBI were busy gathering information from Terrorist 2 in the hospital, Obama directed Eric Holder to Mirandize the terrorist so he could be tried as a civilian. The result was that he stopped talking immediately.

The FBI reported that they were never notified that the Justice Department was going to intervene. They claim to be totally blindsided by that event. Ironic because the FBI actually works under the direction of the DOJ (Department of Justice).

Here are a few questions to ask:

Why Mirandize the suspect when he was singing like a bird? He told the FBI that Times Square was their next target using pipe bombs. Why would the Obama administration want this suspect to clam-up? What are they trying to hide? Does this lend more credibility to Glenn Beck's claims that Janet Napolitano is LYING under oath about a third suspect? Is this just another government attempt to cover-up what happened and who is involved? Why should we trust her word alone?

These are just a few unanswered questions that we should all demand the answers to from Obama. Don't let-up on pressuring the White House. We need answers - not the BS we are getting now.

Wednesday, April 24, 2013


You may have seen this acronym and wondered just what it means. WROL defined is "Without Rule of Law." This refers to the situation where some sort of natural disaster has occurred or that there is a failure or collapse of government. In either case, things are no longer status quo. Life has changed and it's usually not a positive change. There is no more police to "Serve and Protect." You can't dial 911 and expect anyone to answer let alone send someone to help.

Without law-and-order, your lives will be threatened on a daily basis. These threats may NOT come just from your fellow citizens, but also from YOUR government. Did you see the SWAT squads searching houses door-to-door without search warrants? There was no more 4th Amendment when the government took charge in Watertown, Massachusetts. Are you prepared for this situation? You should be!

But, this can NEVER happen here in America. REALLY? Look around and get your head out of the sand.  It's already happened!

DHS (Department of Homeland Security) has purchased 1.6 BILLION rounds of ammunition. Just how do you think they plan on using all that? That's enough ammo to fight a war for the next 30 years!

Answer: To quell civilian uprisings. This explains their stockpiling of arms, armored vehicles, and weapons. Do you really think that the Department of Social Security & Fish and Game need ammo for training purposes? That's what DHS tells us.

It's OK for the government to be "Preppers" but not you - unless you work for the government. Wise-up America. The change is happening in front of your eyes.

The New "Amerika"

A Sad Day
The 4th Amendment is DEAD! SWAT teams killed it last week with their door-to-door, house-to-house searches.

Reminder: The Fourth Amendment says that law enforcement MUST receive written permission from a judge, before they can lawfully search and seize evidence while investigating criminal activity.

Here is the wording: "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."

The SWAT teams, local police, state police, and FBI violated this law totally in their search for the Boston bombers. You need proof? Here it is.

The following photographs were taken by a private citizen as he watched his neighbor's house literally taken-over by the SWAT team. There were NO SEARCH WARRANTS. The entire family was hold-up in their own home after being told to do so by the police.

Then the police decided to cordon-off a several block radius and begin searching every house within that perimeter. There were several family members present in this instance. Each was held at gun-point, each was told to put their hands on their head, each was frisked, and then they were all detained while the police ravaged through their home. DISGUSTING!








This was your government at work "protecting you." Feel safer now?

Tuesday, April 23, 2013

Your Congress At Work - AGAIN!

President Obama thinks that putting a sales tax on all Internet sales is a good thing. So naturally, the Democrats jump on board with his idea. Traditional brick-and-mortar companies have been strongly lobbying for just such a law. They have spent millions of dollars trying to get this legislation. Senate leader Harry Reid (D, NV) has a bill that does just that. It's called "The Marketplace Fairness Act." REALLY? What's so fair about that?

Right now you only pay sales tax on Internet sales if the company you buy from is located in your state. This new legislation negates that and taxes ALL Internet sales no matter where the company or entity is located. This is a major blow to Internet shoppers who do so to avoid, (and save), paying state sales taxes. Unfortunately, now the Obama government wants a piece of the action. Why aren't states complaining? The federal government will get all these revenues!

It doesn't stop there. We bet you haven't heart of CISPA (Cyber Intelligence Sharing Protection Act). This is the government's idea of "protecting" businesses from those nasty hackers. What it does is allows the government to gain more control over the Internet and supposedly offer "protection" in return. REALLY? ANY law that gives the government more control over businesses is a BAD IDEA!

We all know that when someone comes to your door and says "Hi, I'm from the government and I'm here to help you" you'd better run! YOU CANNOT TRUST THIS GOVERNMENT ANY LONGER!

There's more… 82 year old Senator Frank Lautenberg (D, NJ), has re-introduced his bill called "The Explosive Materials Background Check Act." This bill requires a background check to purchase ANY size quantity of black powder, smokeless powder, or any other explosive. Typically people who reload cartridges purchase anywhere from one pound to eight pounds of these materials at a time. They are being punished. The bill also makes it ILLEGAL to manufacturer ANY explosives without a permit. This bill affects those sportsmen who reload ammunition. It is aimed at law-abiding citizens and does nothing to prevent CRIMINALS from buying whatever they want.

The perfect example is the Boston Bombers. They ILLEGALLY purchased handguns and rifles from the black market. They had no "Background Checks" imposed on them. The same thing would happen if they wanted to purchase explosives. This law ignores the fact that anyone buying "explosives" already must provide name, address, phone number, and provide written reasons for these purchases. This includes the purchase of fertilizers.

This law is just a bogus attempt to stop citizens from the sport of reloading, trap and skeet shooting, and from hunting.

Action To Take
Contact your representatives and tell them to get a life and vote "NO" on all these freedom-STEALING laws.

Monday, April 22, 2013

Another Government Cover-up?

Glenn Beck has reported several facts that are disturbing. It points to the STRONG possibility that this administration is committing another cover-up on the Boston Bombings. Here is Glenn's explanation:

What do you think?

Sunday, April 21, 2013

America Changed

The bombings in Boston have changed the face of America forever. We don't even know the details yet and our politicians are already planning new laws to "protect" us from these attacks from happening again. "Hi we're here from the government to protect you!" REALLY? The government has abused its powers this week.

Now we have groups of people on the Internet feeling sorry for the two bombers. No joke. Some say that they are being framed by our government. A few of their relatives support this theory. Some just feel sorry that this "innocent" 19 year old "kid" was brainwashed by his older brother. REALLY? He's NOT a kid, he's a young man. How do these "Terrorist Protectors" know they are innocent?

The Watertown Police Chief Edward Deveau is on the record saying that:

"Now, my closest officer is five to 10 feet away, and they're exchanging gunfire between them. And he runs out of ammunition -- the bad guy -- and so one of my police officers comes off the side and tackles him in the street.'

He was in the process of being handcuffed by two or three officers when his younger brother, 19-year-old Dzhokhar, jumped behind the wheel of a black SUV the two hand allegedly carjacked earlier and barreled toward the group.

Officers who were restraining Tamerlan Tsarnaev got out of the way of the speeding vehicle, which ended up driving over the wounded suspect, the police chief told CNN.
According to Deveau, the 19-year-old suspect dragged his sibling’s body a short distance down the street and drove off. He later ditched the SUV and escaped on foot."

So this "innocent kid" presumably killed his older brother by running him over with a stolen car. That's not so "INNOCENT" now is it?

Future terrorists learned much this past week. They learned that two MURDERING TERRORISTS brought the whole city of Boston to a stand-still. It looked like Death Valley for 12 hours. No one was allowed to come or go in the city. The government closed it all down. This is a DANGEROUS precedent. The government will ask you to give up more freedoms so they can "protect" you. Don't be fooled. Be wary.

Here's why...

Police went door to door searching private homes without the benefit of ANY search warrants. Didn't that act step on our Constitution and Bill of Rights? It turns-out that the police were searching in the wrong place. WHOOPS! Tell that to the people who where told to stay locked up in their own homes. What would the police do to them if they didn't comply? Arrest them for their own good?

Think about that a minute. That's NOT the America you grew up in! That was more like Obama's "Amerika"!