Saturday, February 9, 2013
OMG! Boston Buried
The city of Boston Massachusetts has had a record snowfall of over 24.9 inches. This breaks all previous snow records - including the infamous "Blizzard of 78." Winter storm "Nemo" has done exactly what meteorologists claimed. Amazing, because they usually get the weather predictions wrong in the New England area.
Of course all the green energy nuts are extremely happy because they are blaming this storm on Climate Change & Global Warming. Besides not having to go into work, local residents must now face the daunting task of digging out of their houses. This could take a while, but that's OK, because it's Saturday.
By the way, this also has been one of the coldest winters in a while. Not to worry, the climate folks will always have some lame excuse for that too.
The one good thing about this storm is that Governor Patrick was smart enough to enforce a no driving mandate which saved lives.
All in all, don't be surprised to hear more from the Statist Media claiming this was a result of "Climate Change."
Friday, February 8, 2013
Now that we have a 24/7 TV weather station, our 21st Century meteorologists have to justify their jobs. So what are they doing now? They are giving weird names to all winter snow storms. Today's storm is "Nemo." We can't wait to see what they will call the next winter snowstorm. DUH?
This goes to show you that they have a lot of time on their hands and this is how they use it.
Get a life!
Thursday, February 7, 2013
In case you haven't been paying attention, the President of the United States now believes that he and he alone can and will make life/death decisions that affect ALL American citizens. President Obama actually believes that he alone can condemn Americans to DEATH. He is the judge, jury, prosecutor AND Executioner.
He signed the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), which gives our military police power to arrest American citizens without a warrant, without evidence of wrong doing, in their own homes and hold them without lawyers. This is an unprecedented act which gives the president too much power. If he decides that you're a "terrorist" you can and will be arrested, held, and interrogated indefinitely. Apparently, this act gave him the idea to grab more power.
Now Obama has taken another unilateral step in his power grab, he now believes that he has the authority to decide who lives and who dies. This is the GOD complex. He first used this power against our enemies by using drones to kill them. However, the new twist is that if you are "suspected" of terrorist activities that could harm America, he can assassinate you.
He of course, denies that he would ever use this usurped power against innocent, law abiding Americans. This sounds just like what all dictators say just before they crush all freedom living citizens by killing their opposition. So let's get this straight, we're still leaving the life/death decision up to Obama with no checks balances or rendering of our Constitutional rights.
Why aren't Americans outraged? Why aren't they afraid? Don't they see that this is a huge red warning flag? This unilateral power grab is potentially a disaster to everyone's life as well as their freedom. Look at the history of ANY dictator. History repeats. When will we start listening? It's time be be scared.
One thing we know for sure: Power corrupts. We cannot allow ANY President to think it's OK to kill Americans without due process. This man has to be held accountable.
Wednesday, February 6, 2013
While Obama is out campaigning against gun ownership on YOUR tax dollars, look around. He's always great at deflecting attention away from the other things he doesn't want you to see. This time, it's drones. The government is having such a great time killing "terrorists" that they want to expand drone usage to every state in the USA. And Obama now thinks it is OK to KILL AMERICANS anywhere!
There are only a few states that think that using drones is a bad idea. They are as follows:
- North Dakota
They are the only states actively trying to restrict drone usage by ANY government agency (law enforcement or military). They believe that drones infringe on the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The courts will have to decide who's right.
Obviously, drones can be used to perform surveillance on people without ANY search warrants. This IS ILLEGAL but it doesn't stop the government from doing so. Example: A Montana man was arrested when police used drones to watch his whereabouts to make the arrest.
You may joke about Big Brother, but when these things happen, they erode everyone's freedoms. The way it's going, the government is in control and we have little or nothing to say about it.
Is this what the Founding Fathers wanted? Speak now or loose your freedoms!
Tuesday, February 5, 2013
Drop A Note
If you tried to live for the next four years without some kind of plan or budget, how do you think your life would go? Well, our government has been doing that and much worse over the first term of President' Obama's administration. They have had NO budget and he seems not to care too much about it.
It's the law of the land that Congress & the President pass a budget each year. Obama hasn't signed ANY for four years. Why is this? How is it that Congress and the President can violate the law of the land without any punishment or consequences? Here's a thought: Why don't YOU hold them all accountable for a change? It's time to start making some noise in Washington, DC.
Action To Take
Ask your representatives to support HR 444. This tells the President to submit a balanced budget to Congress. If enough people demand it, it will bring pressure to act.
Monday, February 4, 2013
WHY IS GOVERNMENT STOCKPILING GUNS, AMMO?
by JOSEPH FARAH - editor and CEO of WND and a nationally syndicated columnist with Creators Syndicate.
"Is the U.S. government getting ready for a war we don’t know about?
And, if that’s why Washington is stockpiling massive amounts of ammunition (hollow points, by the way), why is Homeland Security doing the buying instead of the Defense Department?
I have some theories.
Many of you will remember a story I broke a long time ago – about presidential candidate Barack Obama’s little-noticed announcement that, if elected in 2008, he wanted to create a “civilian national security force” as big, as strong and as well-funded as the Defense Department.
Here’s what he actually said at a campaign stop in Colorado July 2, 2008: “We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives we’ve set. We’ve got to have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded.”
Want to make sure you and your family are fully protected? Check out our self-defense section in WND’s Superstore.
Could what we see happening now in the Department of Homeland Security be the beginning of Obama’s dream and our constitutional nightmare?
We’ve learned more about Obama’s vision since then. Maybe it’s time for a review:
He made the campaign promise to build this $439 billion domestic army, but all references to the initiative were inexplicably deleted from the copy of his speech posted on his website while others mysteriously disappeared from transcripts of the speech distributed by the campaign. That was strange – and ominous.
At the time, I had never heard anyone use the phrase “civilian national security force” before. But I did a little homework and found out where it originated. It was first proposed by then Bush administration Defense Secretary Robert Gates. On that basis alone, I accurately predicted that, if elected, Obama would name Gates as his own defense secretary. Needless to say, when that appointment came to pass, no media outlet bothered to interview me about my foresight.
Still during the campaign of 2008, I suggested that what Obama had in mind might be something very sinister indeed – perhaps “some kind of domestic Big Brother program.”
We never heard another mention of Obama’s “civilian national security force” again. Not in 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011 or 2012.
But that brings us up to 2013 and the highly unusual stockpiling of firearms and ammo by Homeland Security – firearms and ammo that Obama would like to deny to ordinary citizens who are not members of his domestic army.
Well, I hate to say it, but I may have predicted this, too.
In a Halloween column last fall, I stated that, if re-elected, Obama would “declare a full-scale war on his domestic opposition.”
I wasn’t joking. I was deadly serious – so serious, in fact, that I did something I pledged I would never do: Vote for Mitt Romney. It was a matter of self-defense and self-preservation. I said then that a second term of Obama might mean we would never see another free and fair election in America. (I’m not even sure we saw one in 2012.) I suggested due process would go the way of the horse and buggy. I said I expected Obama would move to shut down or destroy all independent media. I even speculated that his biggest critics would eventually be rounded up in the name of national security.
Think about it.
Why does the civilian Department of Homeland Security need billions of rounds of ammunition?
This is the agency that is responsible for policing the border. But it doesn’t.
This is the agency that is responsible for catching terrorists. But it doesn’t.
So why does Homeland Security need so many weapons and enough hollow-point rounds to plug every American six times?
Maybe this is the “civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded” as the Defense Department.
These words – “civilian national security force” – have haunted me ever since I first read them.
Obama has never explained what he meant.
He’s never been called to account for that remark.
Doesn’t this sound like police-state talk to you?
The U.S. Army alone has nearly 500,000 troops. That doesn’t count reserves or National Guard. In 2007, the U.S. defense budget was $439 billion. No one knows what the budget is today because Congress stopped passing budgets when Obama took office.
Is Obama serious about creating some kind of domestic security force bigger and more expensive than that? Is this part of his second-term agenda?
He has also set up, as I have reported, a new homeland security bureaucracy to operate under his own direction.
I think it’s worth recalling here that just over a year ago both houses of Congress unwisely passed the defense reauthorization bill that killed the concept of habeas corpus – legislation that authorized the president to use the U.S. military to arrest and indefinitely detain American citizens without charge or trial.
That legislation would empower a lame-duck Obama to use all of the power of the federal government – constitutional and unconstitutional – to target his political enemies.
If any Republican, conservative, independent journalist, pro-life activist, returning veteran, gun-rights activist, constitutionalist, Bible believer or critic of Obama thinks they will be safe in a second term under this would-be despot, they had better think again – real fast.
The “civilian national security force” is not here to protect any of them. It’s here to destroy the opposition. It’s here to destroy liberty. It’s here to destroy the Constitution."
Sunday, February 3, 2013
Don't be fooled when someone in the Republican Party says they are looking out for you. That's just more CRAP coming from GOP Establishment. Here's the proof. Carl Rove (Bush insider) is spearheading a newly formed group called the "Conservative Victory Project." This new group is chartered to "recruit seasoned candidates and protect Senate incumbents from challenges by far-right conservatives and Tea Party enthusiasts who Republican leaders worry could complicate the party'd effort to win and control of the Senate." They don't like Tea Party people replacing their guys in the Senate and they are trying to stop this from happening.
What This Means
Finally, Rove demonstrates his TRUE colors by letting us all know he has openly declared war against the Tea Party conservatives. By this action, Rove is letting us know that he's standing up for the Good-Old-Boy network in Washington and does NOT support REAL conservatism. If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, it IS a duck. In this case, Carl Rove is letting you know that he is NOT a conservative - but a PROGRESSIVE who calls himself a "Republican." For sure, Carl Rove is no Conservative. It's good to know who your enemies are.
Time For A Change
If you are still registered as a Republican, it's time to drop that label and register as an Independent or Libertarian. Stop listening to the GOP propaganda and start listening to YOUR conscience. With friends like these, who needs enemies? As an Independent you can avoid the lies and losers and choose the candidates YOU want for a change!