Saturday, May 26, 2012

Global Governance

Well Kept Secret
The United Nations is busy trying to take over our lives with the idea of "Global Governance" and the unspoken "New World Order." Every chance they get, the UN is there trying to STEAL our freedoms or liberties away from us for the "Greater Good." That's BS and we won't tolerate it!

Ironic that you probably were not aware of their latest initiative. The Corrupt Media doesn't seem to be too interested in reporting anything that has to do with YOUR freedoms or YOUR sovereignty being stolen. Just like they forgot to mention the 43 lawsuits filed last week against the Obama administration for attacking religious freedoms!

Hearings Next Week
The House of Representatives is going to have public hearings on the UN's proposal for taking control of "regulating the Internet." Their latest proposal would give the UN's International Telecommunications Union (ITU) major control over the governance of the Internet. Goodbye free speech! Hey, where's Al Gore when you need him? Isn't he the one who claimed that HE invented the Internet, or was that Liz Warren? Oh no, she's the FAKE Native American (1/32 Cherokee lady). Sorry, Al!

What do you think about the idea? Do you like the idea of letting the United Nations control the Internet? Our government is actually considering giving-up their controls and OUR freedoms to the United Nations. This is all for the "Greater Good" of the world population.

QUESTION: Since when does the United States bow-down to the United Nations and listen to what THEY tell us to do? We are a sovereign nation, or at least we were the last time we looked. We make our own decisions about what we do or don't do. Our good buddies China, Russia, Brazil, and India are all in support of this idea and they are pushing this agenda too. Well, it's nice to know who your friends are!

Action To Take
Unless you will like living in a gulag, you'd better listen up! Tell your Representatives that this is not only a BAD IDEA, but that you are PISSED that they are even considering it. Remind them that you will be voting in November.

While you're at it, tell your US Senators to SCRAP the "Law of the Sea Treaty" because we don't want the United Nations telling us which sea lanes are open and which are not. Not to mention, we don't like the idea of the United Nations taxing OUR offshore oil rigs so they can give that money to their friends and other MARXIST nations!

Isn't it time you wake up America? You don't even recognize Communism when it stares you in the face!! That's pathetic!

Friday, May 25, 2012


Paranoid means being suspicious, having illusions about being followed, persecuted, or about being afraid or distrustful of others. Do others accuse you of being paranoid because you are concerned about disaster preparedness? Do they remind you that "Y2K" was a big joke?

Do You Understand These Acronyms?
Do you know, understand, or use a lot of these in your everyday speech?
  • BOB – bug out bag
  • BOV – bug out vehicle
  • CCP - Concealed Carry Permit
  • CCW - Concealed Carry Weapon (permit or gun)
  • CWP - Concealed Weapons Permit
  • Decon – decontamination
  • EMP – electromagnetic pulse
  • FAK – first aid kit
  • FIFO – first in first out (food rotation)
  • FWIW – for what it’s worth
  • GOOD – get out of Dodge
  • GTG – good to go
  • JIC – just in case
  • KISS - keep it simple stupid
  • LRW - long Range Weapon
  • MRE – meals ready to eat
  • NBC – nuclear or biological warfare
  • POV – personally owned vehicle
  • Prepper – one who practices preparedness, a survivalist
  • TEOTWAWKI – the end of the world as we know it
  • WMD – weapons of mass destruction
  • WTSHTF (when the shit hits the fan) or TSHTF or SHTF – when the "stuff" hits the fan
Are These Things on Your Mind?
  • Anthrax
  • Apocalypse
  • Atomic Bomb attack
  • Barter Currency
  • Chemical spills
  • Dirty Bomb
  • Disasters
  • Droughts
  • Earthquakes
  • Economic collapse
  • EMP Bombs
  • End-Of-Days
  • Floods
  • Global pandemics (Avian bird flu)
  • Just-in-time-food-supply
  • Mayan calendar
  • Mud slides
  • Peak Oil
  • Power Grid Outage
  • Riots
  • Solar flare
  • Tornadoes
  • Tsunamis
  • Y2K
You're a Prepper! Welcome to the club! You're following the Boy Scout's motto: "Be Prepared." You're GTG!!!

Thursday, May 24, 2012

Guest Article - A BAD IDEA

The Law of the Sea treaty will sink America's economy
by Senator Orin Hatch & Senator John Cornyn

"Americans despise taxes.  After all, one of the key issues that paved the way for the American Revolution was the unfair taxation that King George III levied against the Colonies.

Now some in the US Senate want to say yes to an international tax.  It would be the first time in history that an international organization would possess taxing authority, and it would amount to billions of American dollars being transferred out of the US Treasury. 

The U.N. Convention on the Law of the Sea, or the Law of the Sea Treaty (LOST) is the vehicle through which such taxes would be imposed on U.S.-based commercial enterprises.  

The treaty that Reagan refused to sign in 1982 is reappearing once again in the Senate.  The truth is, LOST contains numerous provisions that hurt the U.S. economy at a time when we need more jobs – not fewer. 

Under the guise of being for “the good of mankind, ” LOST would obligate the United States to share information and technology in what amounts to global taxes and technology transfer requirements that are really nothing more than an attempt to redistribute U.S. wealth to the Third World.

At the center of these taxes and transfers is the International Seabed Authority (ISA), a Kingston, Jamaica based supra-national governing body established by the treaty for the purpose of redistributing cash and technology from the “developed world” to the “developing world.”

Ceding authority to the ISA would mean that the sovereignty currently held by the U.S. over the natural resources located on large parts of the continental shelf would be lost.  That loss would mean lost revenue for the US government in the form of lost royalties that the U.S. government collects from the production of those resources. According to the U.S. Extended Continental Shelf Task Force, which is currently mapping the continental shelf, the resources there “may be worth billions if not trillions” of dollars.

In case proponents of LOST have not noticed, the US is over $15 trillion in debt, and we still have more than 20 million Americans who can’t find a job. The last thing we need to do redistribute funds from our country to our economic and strategic competitors.

To make matters worse, the US would have no control over how or to whom the taxes and technology would be redistributed.

Undoubtedly funds that rightfully belong to the American taxpayer would be sent to corrupt governmental regimes, make dictators wealthier, and could even be used for activities directed against the United States and our interests.

Under the treaty, the transfer of these funds does not end with nation states.  These royalty revenues would even be extended to “peoples who have not attained full independence or other self-governing status.”  That means groups like the Palestinian Authority and potentially other groups with terrorist ties.

Proponents of the treaty will claim that the technology transfer portion of the treaty has been significantly changed.  In truth, nations with mining and resource recovery technologies like the United States will be obligated to share those technologies with Third World competitors, and that is one of the many issues, which trouble those of us opposed to the treaty.

In other words, US companies would be forced to give away the very types of innovation that historically have made our nation a world leader while fueling our economic engine.

Under the best of US economic circumstances, the Senate should say no to such an egregious breach of the trust Americans have placed in us. Our current economic struggles are all the more reason to say no to a treaty that is all cost and no benefit."

Wednesday, May 23, 2012

Law of The Sea Treaty

Giveaway of US Sovereignty
We need to KILL this treaty. Obama wants it passed. He and Hillary Clinton have been working with the United Nations to give-up American sovereignty. John Kerry (D, MA) is leading the charge, and so are: Dick Lugar (RINO & Lame and Lame Duck),  and John McCain (AZ RINO) is also supporting it!

Right now the US enforces open sea lanes across the globe. This treaty strips us from these powers. Instead, it gives these powers to a UN tribunal! They will decide which sea lanes will be open and which shall not!

In addition, this treaty gives away 1/2 of our revenues from all offshore drilling to the United Nations so they can give it away to counties of their choice!

Treaties can only be nullified by a constitutional amendment. We CANNOT allow this to pass!

We need a majority in the US Senate to stop this treaty! You need to tell your family and friends that this is BAD for the United States. You need to ask these people to sign the following petition and get their friends and neighbors to do so also.

Sign the petition to stop the treaty that gives-up Our sovereignty:


Tuesday, May 22, 2012

The Great Deflector

Do You Still Support The OWS?
In a press conference yesterday, Obama was asked about the the Occupy Chicago protesters. Seven minutes later, he still hadn't answered the question, but went onto another. When this guy speaks you REALLY need to listen to see how he answers or doesn't answer the questions. President Obama can talk and talk forever and never say anything. Sure, he is a nice guy and people like him. But don't forget, he's ALSO a politician first, and President second! He loves to blather ad infinitum instead of answer a "yes" or "no" question.

We Need REAL Answers
Just exactly where does President Obama stand on the Occupy Wall Street (OWS) movement? Does he condone the stabbing of Chicago police officers? Why hasn't he condemned them for their destructive behaviors? Has he "evolved" a new position on them? Why won't he speak-out against them? Does he still support them and want them to succeed in their attempts to bring-down Capitalism? If the Tea Party were promoting this violence, what would he be doing and what would he be saying?

Both Ways
Obama wants to have it both ways. When a message and activity supports HIS Collapse Plan for America, he refuses to condemn the Domestic TERRORISTS who have taken-over the OWS, (sorry, we now call them the "OCUMORONS" instead). However, if this were the Tea Party, he would be blasting and condemning their behavior.

Mr President, you can't have it both ways!

We Americans deserve consistency and fairness - not hypocrisy! Stop being the "Great Deflector" and stand-up and answer these questions.

Skip the BS! Where do you stand?

Monday, May 21, 2012

Corrupt Media Strikes Again

Double Standards Are Blatant
When John Kerry was running for President, there were no issues raised or anything flagged about his wealth or how he got it. There was also no mention of his religion. Kerry became a very wealthy man when he married into the Heinz ketchup family. He didn't earn his wealth, he married into it. And he is now loaded! Kerry is a true "1 Percenter!"

History Repeats Itself
Now we have a President who has had a 3 1/2 year record of dismal economic policies that have failed and caused tremendous unemployment and job losses. Obama's regulatory policies have caused record gasoline prices, high food costs, and skyrocketing energy prices. he needs to change the focus from his record to something else.

Since Obama can't run on his record, Obama has switched to an old proven method to get re-elected. He is deliberately trying to divide and split the population into diverse factions. In so doing, the axiom is to divide and conquer. It worked well for FDR (Franklin Delano Roosevelt) under similar circumstances when he ran for re-election in 1934. The country was still in a depression and his policies hadn't worked. Unemployment was still at 16% and he needed a plan to get people to forget the bad results. So FDR used class warfare as his political strategy and it won him another term in the White House. FDR won four terms in office!

Obama is doing the exact same thing. He's copying FDR's plan book and trying to split America.

The Corrupt Media is Complacent
The Corrupt Media is guilty of aiding and abetting Obama in his re-election. They have played their hand and shown their prejudice. Learn from it.

They have focused negative attention towards Romney because he is a wealthy man (although Kerry is even higher-up on the food chain). They are helping Obama promote his class warfare campaign against his opponent (Romney). This is blatant, and despicable. It's all there for anyone with a brain to see.

The Corrupt Media even takes it one step further by including negative discussions about Candidate Romney's Mormon religion. Recall that the Corrupt Media labels ANYONE who discusses Obama Religion as racists. They ignored that Obama was taught the Koran as a child and that he spent 20 years in Reverend Wright's church. However, they have blasted Romney and the Mormon religion in several ways.

Open Your Eyes
Be objective and recognize that we are all being manipulated by the Corrupt Media. You cannot trust their message because it contains prejudicial details with the intention to sway you to re-elect their guy! Tell family and friends that the Corrupt Media cannot be trusted.

Don't be fooled or brainwashed any longer.

Sunday, May 20, 2012

Now THAT'S News!

Arizona Needs Valid Proof
Here's a story that the Corrupt Media doesn't want to report. The Secretary of State in Arizona is asking Hawaii to "validate" Obama's birth certificate. To date, the state of Hawaii has not provided this information and claims that they cannot. If they continue to refuse, then Arizona will remove Obama's name off of the Presidential ballot in November. It's a known fact that Obama has spent several million defending and protecting his claim of US citizenship. He finally produced a certificate of birth a short time ago. This is NOT a valid birth certificate.

Will this action prompt Obama's (liar Attorney General - Eric Holder) to sue the state of Arizona yet another time? We hope so! It may prompt other so-called "Red States" to follow suit and demand the same.

Twist of Fate
Isn't it ironic that the state of Arizona suddenly has the nerve to do such a thing. They are actually challenging President Obama's credentials for the high office. Why would Arizona do this? Could it have anything to do that Obama has attacked the state of Arizona repeatedly over the last three years? What do you think?

It gives one pause to wonder what would happen if several other states did the same thing.

This challenge might clear-up the case of why Obama nominated Elana Kagan to the Supreme Court because she worked in HIS favor while serving as Solicitor General. She helped dismiss all the suits filed against him regarding his citizenship. Then after he was elected, Obama nominated her for the Supreme Court job opening. Coincidence? FAT CHANCE! More like payback! (If in doubt, search the Supreme Court docket files for Obama and Kagan).

More Suits?
So will there be more challenges from various states across America? Do they have legitimate grounds to make this challenge? Will the truth ever come out?

Only time will tell. No one has a crystal ball that can predict Obama's future. One thing for sure, this is an ironic twist of fate directed towards President Obama. We think HE DESERVES IT! What goes around, comes around!