Is the WH Prodmoting Propaganda?

Is the White House of the United States of America guilty of producing propaganda to promote Obama’s agenda?

One of the key elements in Saul Alinsky’s (The avowed Communist/alias “Progressive” - remember how radicals like euphemisms to deceive) methodology is to brainwash individuals. However, Alinsky doesn’t say “brainwash” it’s more like “indoctrinate” instead. Either way, Alinsky believes that radicals must use propaganda to help promote their agenda. This is an insidious method that allows radicals to deliver their message without making the target audience aware that they are being manipulated or coerced. The message can be directed towards children, as well as adults.

Could it be possible that the White House is using propaganda the same way Alinsky outlines in his book “Rules for Radicals?” You decide.

Here is an excerpt of a teleconference call sponsored by the National Endowment for the Arts (NEA) and its membership leaders. Yosi Sergant was (in August) the Director of Communications at the NEA. He helped make the political image of Obama’s "Hope" omnipresent as an organizer of artists during the Obama political campaign.

He seemed to mix the NEA’s work with the administration’s legislative agenda after the election. The NEAs Director of Communications Yosi Sergant said this: "This is just the beginning. This is the first telephone call of a brand new conversation. We are just learning how to really bring this community [NEA] together to speak with the government. What that looks like legally. We’re still trying to find out the laws of putting government websites on FaceBook and the use of Twitter. This is all being sorted out. We are participating in history as it’s being made. So bear with us as we learn the language so we can speak to each other safely. And we can really work together to get stuff done." He stated further: "I would encourage you to pick something, whether it’s health care, education, the environment, you know, there’s four key areas that the corporation has identified as the areas of service."

The issue revolves around the NEA selecting and encouraging artists to participate in Obama’s policies and agendas led by the first lady and their close friend Valerie Jarrett. This is nothing more than promoting propaganda using a taxpayer funded organization. Is this ethical – let alone legal?

White House representative Buffy Wicks (under Valerie Jarrett) said in response teleconference to the same group at the NEA: "I’m the office of Public Engagement here at the White House. Our office does a lot of outreach to communities all across the country either by constituency group or by issue. We have 20 folks and we work under Valerie Jarrett. We’re at you’re disposal and we want to be helpful to you."

Doesn't this sound like promoting propaganda from the White House? The White House claims that "We're not involved in indoctrination." Yeah, well then why did Yosi Sergant resign after this became public knowledge?